Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 May;88(5):355-61.
doi: 10.1097/phm.0b013e31819c506d.

Multifidus morphology in persons scheduled for single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with anatomical correlates

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Multifidus morphology in persons scheduled for single-level lumbar microdiscectomy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with anatomical correlates

Kornelia Kulig et al. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was 2-fold: (1) to analyze the degree and the location of lumbar multifidus asymmetry among patients scheduled for L4-L5 microdiscectomy, and (2) to determine the amount of asymmetry recognizable by a radiologist on magnetic resonance imaging.

Design: Bilateral multifidi cross-sectional areas were measured on magnetic resonance axial images of 20 patients scheduled to undergo L4-L5 microdiscectomy. The sides were compared and the location and amount of asymmetry (%)determined. The axial slices were assigned to two different categories based on their anatomical proximity to the L4-L5 disc (Disc(Ref)) and to the fascicles of the lumbar multifidus attaching to the spinous process of L5 (Muscle(Ref)). The maximal percent difference in cross-sectional area was compared between these categories. A radiologist rated the degree of asymmetry visually. These ratings were compared slice by slice to the computed percent difference in the cross-sectional area.

Results: Mean differences in multifidus cross-sectional area were 11.5 +/- 5.6% in the Disc(Ref) and 15.8 +/- 9.5% in the Muscle(Ref) categories and were statistically significant (P = 0.03). The radiologist recognized asymmetry when the quantitative difference was at least 12.6%. This level of asymmetry was identified in the Muscle(Ref) category in 45% of cases and in Disc(Ref) in 30% of cases.

Conclusions: Nearly half of the cases scheduled for lumbar microdiscetomy exhibited asymmetry of at least 12.6% in the lumbar multifidus innervated by the L5 nerve root, which is located below the level of the injured disc. A trained radiologist can readily identify this multifidus asymmetry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources