A break-even analysis of a community rehabilitation falls prevention service
- PMID: 19630843
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00382.x
A break-even analysis of a community rehabilitation falls prevention service
Abstract
Objective: To identify and compare the minimum number of clients that a multidisciplinary falls prevention service delivered through domiciliary or centre-based care needs to treat to allow the service to reach a 'break-even' point.
Method: A break-even analysis was undertaken for each of two models of care for a multidisciplinary community rehabilitation falls prevention service. The two models comprised either a centre-based group exercise and education program or a similar program delivered individually in the client's home. The service consisted of a physiotherapist, occupational therapist and therapy assistant. The participants were adults aged over 65 years who had experienced previous falls. Costs were based on the actual cost of running a community rehabilitation team located in Brisbane. Benefits were obtained by estimating the savings gained to society from the number of falls prevented by the program on the basis of the falls reduction rates obtained in similar multidisciplinary programs.
Results: It is estimated that a multi-disciplinary community falls prevention team would need to see 57 clients per year to make the service break-even using a centre-based model of care and 78 clients for a domiciliary-based model.
Conclusions and implications: The service this study was based on has the capability to see around 300 clients per year in a centre-based service or 200-250 clients per year in a home-based service. Based on the best available estimates of costs of falls, multidisciplinary falls prevention teams in the community targeting people at high risk of falls are worthwhile funding from a societal viewpoint.
Similar articles
-
Randomized trial of domiciliary versus center-based rehabilitation: which is more effective in reducing falls and improving quality of life in older fallers?J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010 Jun;65(6):672-9. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq054. Epub 2010 Apr 26. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010. PMID: 20421240 Clinical Trial.
-
A preliminary study of the effectiveness of an otolaryngology-based multidisciplinary falls prevention clinic.Ear Nose Throat J. 2008 Sep;87(9):510-3. Ear Nose Throat J. 2008. PMID: 18800322
-
Cost-effectiveness in fall prevention for older women.Scand J Public Health. 2009 Aug;37(6):584-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494809341093. Scand J Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19666674
-
Update on falls prevention for community-dwelling older adults: review of single and multifactorial intervention programs.J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(8):1135-52. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008. PMID: 19235116 Review.
-
Using senior volunteers as peer educators: What is the evidence of effectiveness in falls prevention?Australas J Ageing. 2009 Mar;28(1):7-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00320.x. Australas J Ageing. 2009. PMID: 19243369 Review.
Cited by
-
Systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of community-based falls prevention economic models.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Jul 16;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00367-y. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022. PMID: 35842721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Qualitative research to inform economic modelling: a case study in older people's views on implementing the NICE falls prevention guideline.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 28;21(1):1020. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07056-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021. PMID: 34583685 Free PMC article.
-
Economic models of community-based falls prevention: a systematic review with subsequent commissioning and methodological recommendations.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 7;22(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07647-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35255898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical