Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul 25;28(1):106.
doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-106.

Mutation analysis of Rad18 in human cancer cell lines and non small cell lung cancer tissues

Affiliations

Mutation analysis of Rad18 in human cancer cell lines and non small cell lung cancer tissues

Tadahiko Nakamura et al. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Background: Genetic instability is known as a cause of oncogenesis. Though Rad18 is reported to function in a post replication mismatch repair system, the relation between the status of Rad18 and human tumorigenesis has not been described so far.

Methods: Mutation analysis of 34 human cancer cell lines and 32 non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues were performed by RT-PCR SSCP. Expression level of Rad18 was measured by real time RT-PCR. Stable transfectant was constructed for in vitro study.

Results: No mutation was found in both cancer cell lines and NSCLC tissues. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at codon 302 was detected in 51.5% of the cell lines and 62.5% of NSCLC tissues. Interestingly, Rad18 was homozygously deleted in a pulmonary adenocarcinoma cell line PC3. Furthermore, there was no difference in the expression level of wild type Rad18 and Rad18 with SNP. The growth, cell morphology, sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs and in vitro DNA repair activity between wild type Rad18 and Rad18 with SNP revealed to have no difference in vitro.

Conclusion: Though the frequency of SNP was tended to be higher in NSCLC patients than healthy volunteers (57.7%), as the difference was not significant, we have concluded that there is no relation between Rad18 SNP and lung cancer development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The expression of Rad18 in human cancer cell lines. A: RT-PCR analysis of Rad18 in human cancer cell lines. A part of cell lines examined are present. The expression of Rad18 mRNA is observed in all cancer cell lines but PC3 (lane 24). Lane 1: KYSE30, 2: KYSE140, 3: TE1, 4: TE9, 5: TE10, 6: AGS, 7: MKN1, 8: MKN28, 9: NUGC3, 10: NUGC4, 11: Caco2, 12: Colo201, 13: Colo205, 14: DLD-1, 15: HCT116, 16: AsPC-1, 17: Capan1, 18: Capan2, 19: Panc1, 20: SUIT-2, 21: A549, 22: EBC1, 23: LU99, 24: PC3, 25: LCOK. B: Fragment Southern of PC3 (lane 1) and MCF7 (lane 2). Rad18 is homozygously deleted in lung cancer cell line PC3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
SSCP analysis of human cancer cell line. A: A part of SSCP of primer set 7 is present. The shifted abnormal band is pointed. B: The result of direct sequence of the shifted band. At codon 302, three different patterns were detected.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rad18 expression level in lung cancer tissues. Left: Expression level according to wild type and SNP. Right: Expression level according to the pattern of codon 302.
Figure 4
Figure 4
In vitro study of Rad18 WT and Rad18 SNP. A: Expression of introduced Rad18 assessed by RT-PCR (top) and Western blotting (bottom). Lane 1: PC3 + LacZ, 2: PC3-WT Rad18, 3: PC3-SNP Rad18. B: Cell morphology of the three cell lines. C: Growth assay of the three cell lines. D: Sensitivity to CDDP (left) and CPT-11 (right) in the three cell lines. E: Percent survival at day 7 for different dose of CDDP (left) and CPT-11 (right).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Drug sensitivity and repair function of Rad18 and the SNP. A: Sensitivity to CDDP (left) and CPT-11 (right) in the three cell lines. B: Percent survival at day 7 for different dose of CDDP (left) and CPT-11 (right). C: DNA repair assay of LacZ, WT(A/A), hetero(A/G), SNP(G/G). The vertical axis is the amount of RPA protein which shows the activity of DNA repair function.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heinen CD, Schmutte C, Fishel R. DNA repair and tumorigenesis: lessons from hereditary cancer syndromes. Cancer Biol Ther. 2002;5:477–85. - PubMed
    1. Lovett ST. Polymerase switching in DNA replication. Mol Cell. 2007;27:523–6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbour L, Ball LG, Zhang K, Xiao W. DNA damage checkpoints are involved in postreplication repair. Genetics. 2006;174:1789–800. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.056283. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callegari AJ, Kelly TJ. Shedding light on the DNA damage checkpoint. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:660–6. - PubMed
    1. McIntyre J, Podlaska A, Skoneczna A, Halas A, Sledziewska-Gojska E. Analysis of the spontaneous mutator phenotype associated with 20S proteasome deficiency in S. cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 2006;593:153–63. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms