Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods
- PMID: 19632867
- PMCID: PMC2763994
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.005
Matching breast masses depicted on different views a comparison of three methods
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Computerized determination of optimal search areas on mammograms for matching breast mass regions depicted on two ipsilateral views remains a challenge for developing multiview-based computer-aided detection (CAD) schemes. The purpose of this study was to compare three methods aimed at matching CAD-cued mass regions depicted on two views and the associated impact on CAD performance.
Materials and methods: The three search methods used (1) an annular (fan-shaped) band, (2) a straight strip perpendicular to the estimated centerline, and (3) a mixed search area bound on the chest wall side by a straight line and an annular arc on the nipple side, respectively. An image database of 200 examinations with positive results depicting the masses on two views and 200 examinations with negative results was used for testing. Two performance assessment experiments were conducted. The first investigated the maximum matching sensitivity as a function of the search area size, and the second assessed the change in CAD performance using these three search methods.
Results: To include all 200 paired mass regions within the search areas, maximum widths were 28 and 68 mm for the use of the straight strip and the annular band search methods, respectively. When applying a single-image-based CAD scheme to this image database, 172 masses (86% sensitivity) and 523 false-positive (FP) regions (0.33 per image) were detected and cued. Among the positive findings, 92 were cued by the CAD system on both views, and 80 were cued on only one view. In an attempt to match as many of the 172 CAD-cued masses (true-positive [TP] regions) on two views by incrementally reducing the CAD threshold inside the different search areas, the CAD scheme generated 158 TP-TP paired matches with 14 TP-FP paired matches, 142 TP-TP paired matches with 30 TP-FP paired matches, and 146 TP-TP paired matches with 26 TP-FP paired matches, using the methods involving the straight strip, the annular band, and the mixed search areas, respectively. Using the straight strip search method, the CAD also eliminated 25% of FP regions initially cued by the single-image-based CAD scheme and generated the lowest case-based FP detection rate, namely, 15% less than that generated by the annular band method.
Conclusions: This study showed that among these three search methods, the straight strip method required a smaller search area and achieved the highest level of CAD performance.
Figures








Similar articles
-
Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses.Med Phys. 2006 Sep;33(9):3135-43. doi: 10.1118/1.2237476. Med Phys. 2006. PMID: 17022205
-
An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.Med Phys. 2008 Feb;35(2):487-94. doi: 10.1118/1.2828188. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 18383669 Free PMC article.
-
Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4451-60. doi: 10.1118/1.3220669. Med Phys. 2009. PMID: 19928076 Free PMC article.
-
A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.Med Phys. 2004 Nov;31(11):2964-72. doi: 10.1118/1.1806291. Med Phys. 2004. PMID: 15587648
-
Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.Acad Radiol. 2012 Mar;19(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.026. Epub 2011 Dec 14. Acad Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22173323 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Automatic detection of the nipple in screen-film and full-field digital mammograms using a novel Hessian-based method.J Digit Imaging. 2013 Oct;26(5):948-57. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9587-6. J Digit Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23508373 Free PMC article.
-
Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.Phys Med Biol. 2014 Aug 7;59(15):4357-73. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/15/4357. Epub 2014 Jul 17. Phys Med Biol. 2014. PMID: 25029964 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge.Med Image Anal. 2014 Feb;18(2):359-73. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 25. Med Image Anal. 2014. PMID: 24418598 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement in matching lesions in dual-view mammograms using a geometric model.BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01862-3. BMC Med Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40790177 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, et al. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. Radiology. 2004;233:418–423. - PubMed
-
- Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening program: prospective study. Radiology. 2005;237:444–449. - PubMed
-
- Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammograms. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;187:1483–1491. - PubMed
-
- Nishikawa RM, Edwards AV, Schmidt RA, Papaioannou J. Can radiologists recognize that a computer has identified cancers that they have overlooked? Proc SPIE. 2006;6146:1–8.
-
- Nishikawa RM, Kallergi M. Computer-aided detection in its present form is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Med Phys. 2006;33:811–814. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous