Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Sep;49(3):272-82.
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181a491e7.

Quality of health care in the United States: implications for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Affiliations
Review

Quality of health care in the United States: implications for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Brendan M Boyle et al. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine's publications To Error is Human and Crossing the Quality Chasm publicized the widespread deficits in US health care quality. Emerging studies continue to reveal deficits in the quality of adult and pediatric care, including subspecialty care. In recent years, key stakeholders in the health care system including providers, purchasers, and the public have been applying various quality improvement methods to address these concerns. Lessons learned from these efforts in other pediatric conditions, including asthma, cystic fibrosis, neonatal intensive care, and liver transplantation may be applicable to the care of children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).This review is intended to be a primer on the quality of care movement in the United States, with a focus on pediatric IBD. In this article, we review the history, rationale, and methods of quality measurement and improvement, and we discuss the unique challenges in adapting these general strategies to pediatric IBD care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No authors have a conflict of interest to disclose

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The chronic care model
The chronic care model, a useful framework for delivery system design, posits that improved patient outcomes are the result of carefully designed and coordinated systems of care that include patient and family self-management support, delivery system design, decision support, and clinical information systems working in concert with the greater health care organization and community resources.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Model for Improvement
The Model for Improvement describes a stepwise process for process improvement. Time-sensitive and measurable aims are established, quantitative measures are developed to determine whether specific changes lead to improvement, and changes that are most likely to result in improvement are identified. Changes are then tested on a small scale using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle-planning interventions, trying them, observing the results, and acting on what is learned.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. A Journey Through the History of The Joint Commission. [[cited 2008 August 17]]; Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/AboutUs/joint_commission_history.htm.
    1. Donabedian A. The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18(11):356–360. - PubMed
    1. Brook RH, McGlynn EA, Cleary PD. Measuring Quality of Care- Part Two of Six. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(13):966–970. - PubMed
    1. Chassin MR, Galvin RW Q. and the National Roundtable on Health Care. The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care Quality: Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA. 1998;280(11):1000–1005. - PubMed
    1. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):961–964. - PMC - PubMed