Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul 27:9:177.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-177.

Plant traits correlated with generation time directly affect inbreeding depression and mating system and indirectly genetic structure

Affiliations

Plant traits correlated with generation time directly affect inbreeding depression and mating system and indirectly genetic structure

Jérôme Duminil et al. BMC Evol Biol. .

Abstract

Background: Understanding the mechanisms that control species genetic structure has always been a major objective in evolutionary studies. The association between genetic structure and species attributes has received special attention. As species attributes are highly taxonomically constrained, phylogenetically controlled methods are necessary to infer causal relationships. In plants, a previous study controlling for phylogenetic signal has demonstrated that Wright's FST, a measure of genetic differentiation among populations, is best predicted by the mating system (outcrossing, mixed-mating or selfing) and that plant traits such as perenniality and growth form have only an indirect influence on FST via their association with the mating system. The objective of this study is to further outline the determinants of plant genetic structure by distinguishing the effects of mating system on gene flow and on genetic drift. The association of biparental inbreeding and inbreeding depression with population genetic structure, mating system and plant traits are also investigated.

Results: Based on data from 263 plant species for which estimates of FST, inbreeding (FIS) and outcrossing rate (tm) are available, we confirm that mating system is the main influencing factor of FST. Moreover, using an alternative measure of FST unaffected by the impact of inbreeding on effective population size, we show that the influence of tm on FST is due to its impact on gene flow (reduced pollen flow under selfing) and on genetic drift (higher drift under selfing due to inbreeding). Plant traits, in particular perenniality, influence FST mostly via their effect on the mating system but also via their association with the magnitude of selection against inbred individuals: the mean inbreeding depression increases from short-lived herbaceous to long-lived herbaceous and then to woody species. The influence of perenniality on mating system does not seem to be related to differences in stature, as proposed earlier, but rather to differences in generation time.

Conclusion: Plant traits correlated with generation time affect both inbreeding depression and mating system. These in turn modify genetic drift and gene flow and ultimately genetic structure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean values of tm, FIS and FST as a function of growth form (H: herbaceous, W: woody), perenniality (SL: short-lived, LL: long-lived), the combination of growth form and perenniality (H/SL: herbaceous short-lived, H/LL: herbaceous long-lived, W/LL: woody long-lived), the mode of pollen dispersal (A: abiotic, B: biotic) and outcrossing rate (MS: mixed mating species, AS: allogamous species). For each category the P-value associated with the statistical test is indicated by *** P < 0.001, ** 0.001<P < 0.01, * 0.01<P < 0.05 and NS for P > 0.05. At the left part of the slash the P-value corresponds to the TIPs test and at the right to the PICs test. "--" indicates an absence of statistical test. Standard error values for each category is available in the additional file 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of tm, FIS and FST according to growth form, perenniality and pollination mode categories (percentile versus ranked tm-estimate, FIS-estimate and FST-estimate data).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Conventional regressions analyses (TIPs) on the left and phylogenetically-controlled regression analyses (PICs) on the right, among plant traits: growth form, perenniality, pollination mode and stature. *** P < 0.001, ** 0.001<P < 0.01, * 0.01<P < 0.05 and NS for P > 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of FIS according to tm. The open circles correspond to short-lived herbaceous species, the closed circles to long-lived herbaceous species and the crosses to woody species. The thick continuous line represents Fe, which is the expected FIS based on the observed tm, assuming a mixed-mating system at equilibrium without inbreeding depression. The other lines correspond to the best-fitting curves according to equation 1 after adjusting the level of inbreeding depression, δ, for short-lived herbaceous species (short-hatched line), perennial herbaceous species (long-hatched line) and woody species (continuous line).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lewontin RC. Twenty-five years ago in Genetics: Electrophoresis in the development of evolutionary genetics: milestone or millstone? Genetics. 1991;128:657–662. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences. 1996;351:1291–1298. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0112. - DOI
    1. Hamrick JL, Linhart YB, Mitton JB. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1979;10:173–200. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.001133. - DOI
    1. Nybom H. Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molecular Ecology. 2004;13:1143–1155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02141.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loveless MD, Hamrick JL. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1984;15:65–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.000433. - DOI

Publication types