Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: a preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation
- PMID: 19635338
- DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.04.008
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia: a preliminary efficacy and mechanisms-based investigation
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and transcutaneous spinal electroanalgesia (TSE) on mechanical pain threshold (MPT) and vibration threshold (VT).
Design: A prospective, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Setting: Laboratory based.
Participants: Thirty-four healthy volunteers (12 men and 22 women; mean age+/-standard deviation 30+/-8 years). Exclusion criteria were conditions affecting upper limb sensation and contraindications to electrical stimulation.
Interventions: Participants were allocated at random to receive TENS (n=8), TSE (n=8), placebo (n=9) or control (n=9). Electrical stimulation was applied for 30 minutes (from time 18 minutes to 48 minutes) via electrodes (5 cmx5 cm) placed centrally above and below the space between the C6 and C7 spinous processes, with 5 cm between electrodes.
Main outcome measures: MPT (using an algometer) and VT (using a vibrameter) were recorded on seven occasions from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of the right hand - at baseline (0 minutes) and then at 10-minute intervals until the end of the 60-minute testing period.
Results: There were no statistically significant group differences in MPT (all p>0.05). Significant group differences in VT were found at 20, 30 and 40 minutes (all p<0.05). Post-hoc tests showed that the TENS group had significantly greater VT than both the placebo [median difference 0.30 microm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05 to 0.66] and control (0.51 microm, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.97) groups at 20 minutes, and significantly greater VT than the control group (0.69 microm, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.17) at 30 minutes (all p<0.008).
Conclusions: Electrical stimulation did not alter MPT. The increase in VT during TENS may be due to distraction or antidromic block of large-diameter nerve fibres. TSE failed to alter either outcome measure significantly.
Similar articles
-
Effects of intensity of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on pressure pain threshold and blood pressure in healthy humans: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):773-80. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a7ece3. Clin J Pain. 2009. PMID: 19851157 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of burst-type transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cervical range of motion and latent myofascial trigger point pain sensitivity.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Sep;92(9):1353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.010. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011. PMID: 21878204 Clinical Trial.
-
Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy subjects.Physiother Res Int. 2007 Dec;12(4):251-63. doi: 10.1002/pri.384. Physiother Res Int. 2007. PMID: 17957730 Clinical Trial.
-
Overview of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of acute postoperative pain.Med Instrum. 1983 Jul-Aug;17(4):289-92. Med Instrum. 1983. PMID: 6355789 Review.
-
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of subjective tinnitus. A placebo-controlled, randomized and comparative analysis.ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70(3):156-61. doi: 10.1159/000124288. Epub 2008 Apr 8. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008. PMID: 18401195 Review.
Cited by
-
Analgesia for Sheep in Commercial Production: Where to Next?Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 14;11(4):1127. doi: 10.3390/ani11041127. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33920025 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous