Accelerated approval of cancer drugs: improved access to therapeutic breakthroughs or early release of unsafe and ineffective drugs?
- PMID: 19636013
- PMCID: PMC2744277
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1961
Accelerated approval of cancer drugs: improved access to therapeutic breakthroughs or early release of unsafe and ineffective drugs?
Abstract
Purpose: Accelerated approval (AA) was initiated by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to shorten development times of drugs for serious medical illnesses. Sponsors must confirm efficacy in postapproval trials. Confronted with several drugs that received AA on the basis of phase II trials and for which confirmatory trials were incomplete, FDA officials have encouraged sponsors to design AA applications on the basis of interim analyses of phase III trials.
Methods: We reviewed data on orphan drug status, development time, safety, and status of confirmatory trials of AAs and regular FDA approvals of new molecular entities (NMEs) for oncology indications since 1995.
Results: Median development times for AA NMEs (n = 19 drugs) and regular-approval oncology NMEs (n = 32 drugs) were 7.3 and 7.2 years, respectively. Phase III trials supported efficacy for 75% of regular-approval versus 26% of AA NMEs and for 73% of non-orphan versus 45% of orphan drug approvals. AA accounted for 78% of approvals for oncology NMEs between 2001 and 2003 but accounted for 32% in more recent years. Among AA NMEs, confirmatory trials were nine-fold less likely to be completed for orphan drug versus non-orphan drug indications. Postapproval, black box warnings were added to labels for four oncology NMEs (17%) that had received AA and for two oncology NMEs (9%) that had received regular approval.
Conclusion: AA oncology NMEs are safe and effective, although development times are not accelerated. A return to endorsing phase II trial designs for AA for oncology NMEs, particularly for orphan drug indications, may facilitate timely FDA approval of novel cancer drugs.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures



Comment in
-
Accelerated approval and oncology drug development timelines.J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 10;28(14):e226-7; author reply e228. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2121. Epub 2010 Mar 1. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20194846 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Expediting treatments in the 21st century: orphan drugs and accelerated approvals.Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Nov 8;19(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03398-1. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024. PMID: 39516878 Free PMC article.
-
Accelerated approval of oncology products: the food and drug administration experience.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Apr 20;103(8):636-44. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr062. Epub 2011 Mar 21. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21422403 Review.
-
Effective Market Exclusivity of New Molecular Entities for Rare and Non-rare Diseases.Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Feb;34(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00317-9. Pharmaceut Med. 2020. PMID: 32048213
-
Evaluation of Serious Postmarket Safety Signals Within 2 Years of FDA Approval for New Cancer Drugs.Oncologist. 2020 Apr;25(4):348-354. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0653. Epub 2019 Dec 17. Oncologist. 2020. PMID: 32297444 Free PMC article.
-
Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy.Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Aug;25(6):979-997. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01639-x. Epub 2023 Nov 14. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. PMID: 37962724 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Combined PI3K/mTOR and MEK inhibition provides broad antitumor activity in faithful murine cancer models.Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1;18(19):5290-303. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0563. Epub 2012 Aug 7. Clin Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22872574 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiovascular toxicity of anticancer-targeted therapy: emerging issues in the era of cardio-oncology.Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):113-31. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0744-y. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Intern Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 22161318 Review.
-
Post-market safety warnings for drugs approved in Canada under the Notice of Compliance with conditions policy.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;79(5):847-59. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12552. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25393960 Free PMC article.
-
When is it rational to participate in a clinical trial? A game theory approach incorporating trust, regret and guilt.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 22;12:85. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-85. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012. PMID: 22726276 Free PMC article.
-
Breakthroughs in modern cancer therapy and elusive cardiotoxicity: Critical research-practice gaps, challenges, and insights.Med Res Rev. 2018 Jan;38(1):325-376. doi: 10.1002/med.21463. Epub 2017 Sep 1. Med Res Rev. 2018. PMID: 28862319 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Clinton W, Gore A. Reinventing the regulation of cancer drugs: National performance review. 1996 http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/05/briefing/2005-4191B1_01_03-Reinve....
-
- US Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2008. 21 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 314.510.
-
- Roberts TG, Jr, Chabner BA. Beyond fast track for drug approvals. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:501–505. - PubMed
-
- Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Transcript for March 12, 2003. Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 2005
-
- Dagher R, Johnson J, Williams G, et al. Accelerated approval of oncology products: A decade of experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:1500–1509. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources