Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
- PMID: 19636020
- PMCID: PMC2734420
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225
Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
Abstract
Purpose: Recent changes have occurred in the presurgical planning for breast cancer, including the introduction of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We sought to analyze the trends in mastectomy rates and the relationship to preoperative MRI and surgical year at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Patients and methods: We identified 5,405 patients who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2006. Patients undergoing MRI were identified from a prospective database. Trends in mastectomy rate and the association of MRI with surgery type were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of surgery year and MRI on surgery type, while adjusting for potential confounding variables.
Results: Mastectomy rates differed significantly across time (P < .0001), and decreased from 45% in 1997% to 31% in 2003, followed by increasing rates for 2004 to 2006. The use of MRI increased from 10% in 2003% to 23% in 2006 (P < .0001). Patients with MRI were more likely to undergo mastectomy than those without MRI (54% v 36%; P < .0001). However, mastectomy rates increased from 2004 to 2006 predominantly among patients without MRI (29% in 2003% to 41% in 2006; P < .0001). In a multivariable model, both MRI (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; P < .0001) and surgical year (compared to 2003 OR: 1.4 for 2004, 1.8 for 2005, and 1.7 for 2006; P < .0001) were independent predictors of mastectomy.
Conclusion: After a steady decline, mastectomy rates have increased in recent years with both surgery year and MRI as significant predictors for type of surgery. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of MRI and other factors influencing surgical planning.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures



Comment in
-
More mastectomies: is this what patients really want?J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4038-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0078. Epub 2009 Jul 27. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19635996 No abstract available.
-
Increasing mastectomy rates for early-stage breast cancer? Population-based trends from California.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):e155-7; author reply e158. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.1032. Epub 2010 Feb 16. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20159812 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Variant mastectomy rates: implications for quality of care in breast cancer surgery.J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 20;28(21):e364; author reply e365. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.9703. Epub 2010 Jun 14. J Clin Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20547985 No abstract available.
References
-
- Blichert-Toft M, Rose C, Andersen JA, et al. Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: Six years of life-table analysis: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1992:19–25. - PubMed
-
- Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN, Jr, et al. Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: A randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:976–983. - PubMed
-
- Sarrazin D, Le MG, Arriagada R, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1989;14:177–184. - PubMed
-
- van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–1150. - PubMed
-
- Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–1232. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical