Hospital variation in time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest
- PMID: 19636027
- DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.196
Hospital variation in time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest
Abstract
Background: Delays to defibrillation are associated with worse survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest, but the degree to which hospitals vary in defibrillation response times and hospital predictors of delays remain unknown.
Methods: Using hierarchical models, we evaluated hospital variation in rates of delayed defibrillation (>2 minutes) and its impact on survival among 7479 adult inpatients with cardiac arrests at 200 hospitals within the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Results: Adjusted rates of delayed defibrillation varied substantially among hospitals (range, 2.4%-50.9%), with hospital-level effects accounting for a significant amount of the total variation in defibrillation delays after adjusting for patient factors. We found a 46% greater odds of patients with identical covariates getting delayed defibrillation at one randomly selected hospital compared with another. Among traditional hospital factors evaluated, however, only bed volume (reference category: <200 beds; 200-499 beds: odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.48-0.80]; >or=500 beds: OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.53-1.04]) and arrest location (reference category: intensive care unit; telemetry unit: OR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.65-2.22]; nonmonitored unit: OR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.61-2.24]) were associated with differences in rates of delayed defibrillation. Wide variation also existed in adjusted hospital rates of survival to discharge (range, 5.3%-49.6%), with higher survival among hospitals in the top-performing quartile for defibrillation time (compared with the bottom quartile: OR for top quartile, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.11-1.77]).
Conclusions: Rates of delayed defibrillation vary widely among hospitals but are largely unexplained by traditional hospital factors. Given its association with improved survival, future research is needed to better understand best practices in the delivery of defibrillation at top-performing hospitals.
Comment in
-
In a heartbeat: decreasing in-hospital time to defibrillation.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 27;169(14):1260-1. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.178. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19636025 No abstract available.
-
It is time to get more accurate times to defibrillation.Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2163-4; author reply 2164. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.451. Arch Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 20008704 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Delayed time to defibrillation after in-hospital cardiac arrest.N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 3;358(1):9-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706467. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18172170
-
Delayed time to defibrillation after intraoperative and periprocedural cardiac arrest.Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):782-93. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181eaa74f. Anesthesiology. 2010. PMID: 20808215
-
Variability in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest depending on the hospital level of care.Resuscitation. 2007 Apr;73(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.022. Epub 2007 Jan 23. Resuscitation. 2007. PMID: 17250948
-
If a patient arrests after cardiac surgery is it acceptable to delay cardiopulmonary resuscitation until you have attempted either defibrillation or pacing?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;7(5):878-85. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.182980. Epub 2008 Jun 10. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18544586 Review.
-
[In-hospital resuscitation--definitely better than in the field?].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):476-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1284466. Epub 2011 Aug 3. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011. PMID: 21815115 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Simulation curriculum can improve medical student assessment and management of acute coronary syndrome during a clinical practice exam.Am J Med Sci. 2014 Jun;347(6):452-6. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182a562d7. Am J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24280987 Free PMC article.
-
Association between hospital rates of early Do-Not-Resuscitate orders and favorable neurological survival among survivors of inhospital cardiac arrest.Am Heart J. 2017 Nov;193:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Am Heart J. 2017. PMID: 29129249 Free PMC article.
-
Trajectory of Risk-Standardized Survival Rates for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006514. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006514. Epub 2020 Sep 10. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32907387 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in use of dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results from the national cardiovascular data registry.Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):634-41; discussion 641. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.394. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22529229 Free PMC article.
-
Missed opportunities in use of medical emergency teams prior to in-hospital cardiac arrest.Am Heart J. 2016 Jul;177:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 29. Am Heart J. 2016. PMID: 27297853 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical