Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Oct;35(10):1738-48.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1585-2. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study

Jean-Charles Preiser et al. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: An optimal target for glucose control in ICU patients remains unclear. This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the effects on ICU mortality of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) with an intermediate glucose control.

Methods: Adult patients admitted to the 21 participating medico-surgical ICUs were randomized to group 1 (target BG 7.8-10.0 mmol/L) or to group 2 (target BG 4.4-6.1 mmol/L).

Results: While the required sample size was 1,750 per group, the trial was stopped early due to a high rate of unintended protocol violations. From 1,101 admissions, the outcomes of 542 patients assigned to group 1 and 536 of group 2 were analysed. The groups were well balanced. BG levels averaged in group 1 8.0 mmol/L (IQR 7.1-9.0) (median of all values) and 7.7 mmol/L (IQR 6.7-8.8) (median of morning BG) versus 6.5 mmol/L (IQR 6.0-7.2) and 6.1 mmol/L (IQR 5.5-6.8) for group 2 (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). The percentage of patients treated with insulin averaged 66.2 and 96.3%, respectively. Proportion of time spent in target BG was similar, averaging 39.5% and 45.1% (median (IQR) 34.3 (18.5-50.0) and 39.3 (26.2-53.6)%) in the groups 1 and 2, respectively. The rate of hypoglycaemia was higher in the group 2 (8.7%) than in group 1 (2.7%, p < 0.0001). ICU mortality was similar in the two groups (15.3 vs. 17.2%).

Conclusions: In this prematurely stopped and therefore underpowered study, there was a lack of clinical benefit of intensive insulin therapy (target 4.4-6.1 mmol/L), associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycaemia, as compared to a 7.8-10.0 mmol/L target. (ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT00107601, EUDRA-CT Number: 200400391440).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Glucontrol, no control, or out of control?
    Schultz MJ, Spronk PE, van Braam Houckgeest F. Schultz MJ, et al. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):173-4; author reply 175-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1666-2. Epub 2009 Sep 24. Intensive Care Med. 2010. PMID: 19777206 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1903-11 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):570-1 - PubMed
    1. CMAJ. 2009 Apr 14;180(8):821-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):233-43 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1359-67 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data