Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;36(9):807-14.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01443.x. Epub 2009 Jul 21.

Surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane: a four-year clinical follow-up report

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Surgical regenerative treatment of peri-implantitis lesions using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane: a four-year clinical follow-up report

Frank Schwarz et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: The present case series aimed at investigating the 4-year clinical outcomes following surgical regenerative therapy of peri-implantitis lesions using either a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) or a natural bone mineral in combination with a collagen membrane (NBM+CM).

Materials and methods: Twenty patients suffering from moderate peri-implantitis (n=20 intrabony defects) were randomly treated with (1) access flap surgery (AFS) and the application of NHA (n=9), or with AFS and the application of NBM+CM (n=11). Clinical and radiographic (R) parameters were recorded at baseline (R) and after 36 and 48 (R) months of non-submerged healing.

Results: One patient from the NBM+CM group was discontinued from the study due to severe pus formation at 36 months. Compared with NHA, the application of NBM+CM resulted in higher mean PD reductions (NBM+CM: 2.5 +/- 0.9 mm versus NHA: 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm) and clinical attachment-level gains (NBM+CM: 2.0 +/- 1.0 mm versus NHA: 0.6 +/- 0.5 mm) at 48 months. A radiographic bone fill was observed for five sites in the NHA group, and eight sites in the NBM+CM group.

Conclusion: While the application of NBM+CM resulted in clinical improvements over a period of 4 years, the long-term outcome obtained with NHA without barrier membrane must be considered as poor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources