Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme
- PMID: 19639714
Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme
Abstract
In Australia, most prescription drugs are subsidized through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), one of several government programs in which evidence-based decision making is applied to the funding of health technologies. PBS processes are intended to ensure "value for money" for the Australian taxpayer and to support affordable, equitable access to prescription medicines; they are not intended as a mechanism for cost containment. The inclusion of a drug on the national formulary depends on the recommendation of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), which considers not only the comparative effectiveness but also the comparative cost-effectiveness of drugs proposed for listing. While some decisions have been controversial, the PBS retains strong public support. Moreover, evidence does not suggest that the consideration of cost-effectiveness has created a negative environment for the drug industry: Australia has a high penetration of patented medicines, with prices for some recently approved drugs at U.S. levels.
Similar articles
-
National Authority for Health: France.Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Jul;58:1-9. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009. PMID: 19639712
-
Comparative effectiveness review within the U.K.'s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009 Jul;59:1-12. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2009. PMID: 19639713
-
The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994-2004.Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):713-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315247. Epub 2008 Mar 31. Med Decis Making. 2008. PMID: 18378939
-
The history of health technology assessment in Australia.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:61-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090436. Epub 2009 Jun 8. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009. PMID: 19500436 Review.
-
Decision making the explicit evidence-based way: comparing benefits, harms and costs.Nurs Prax N Z. 1999 Mar;14(1):33-42. Nurs Prax N Z. 1999. PMID: 10481662 Review.
Cited by
-
Reading a cost-effectiveness or decision analysis study: Five things to consider.Neurol Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;3(5):413-420. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e3182a78fd8. Neurol Clin Pract. 2013. PMID: 24175157 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.Lancet. 2017 Jul 8;390(10090):156-168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5. Epub 2017 Jan 9. Lancet. 2017. PMID: 28077234 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jun;29(6):475-95. doi: 10.2165/11586420-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011. PMID: 21568357 Review.
-
From efficacy to equity: Literature review of decision criteria for resource allocation and healthcare decisionmaking.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012 Jul 18;10(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-9. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012. PMID: 22808944 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of specific Beers Criteria medications on associations between drug exposure and unplanned hospitalisation in elderly patients taking high-risk drugs: a case-time-control study in Western Australia.Drugs Aging. 2014 Apr;31(4):311-25. doi: 10.1007/s40266-014-0164-6. Drugs Aging. 2014. PMID: 24615204