Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component
- PMID: 19640673
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.029
Clinical and radiographic evaluation of a monoblock tibial component
Abstract
Modular tibial components are the clinical standard in total knee arthroplasty despite the lack of evidence of improved function and longevity when compared with monoblock implants. This study describes the minimum 5-year outcomes for 125 total knee arthroplasties performed with monoblock tibial components in 101 patients. No patients were lost to follow-up. Average Knee Society Score was 87.1 at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years. Clinical and radiographic follow-up showed all components to be stable, no implants at risk of loosening, no observable osteolysis, and no observed change in bone density. Survivorship free of revision for tibial component loosening was 100% at 5 years. These results show excellent midterm durability of a partially cemented porous tantalum monoblock implant with uncemented pegs.
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Component: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2193-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.057. Epub 2016 Apr 12. J Arthroplasty. 2016. PMID: 27172865
-
Uncemented Tantalum Monoblock Tibial Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 60 Years of Age: Mean 10-Year Follow-up.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 May 16;100(10):865-870. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00724. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. PMID: 29762282
-
Midterm results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component clinical and radiographic results of 108 knees.J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Oct 29. J Arthroplasty. 2011. PMID: 21036009
-
Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):666-674. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 27776898 Review.
-
A flat all-polyethylene tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long-term study.Knee. 2014;21 Suppl 1:S20-5. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50005-1. Knee. 2014. PMID: 25382363 Review.
Cited by
-
The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel). 2021 May 18;14(10):2647. doi: 10.3390/ma14102647. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34070153 Free PMC article. Review.
-
John N. Insall Award: Randomized Clinical Trial of Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Components: Durable and Reliable at a Mean 10-Years Follow-Up.J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S14-S20. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.015. Epub 2023 Mar 15. J Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 36931364 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component: clinical and radiographic results at follow-up of 10 years.Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 7;3(3):192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.004. eCollection 2017 Sep. Arthroplast Today. 2017. PMID: 28913406 Free PMC article.
-
Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3543-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3183-4. Epub 2013 Jul 25. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013. PMID: 23884802 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Modular versus nonmodular tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty: what are the differences?Ann Transl Med. 2017 May;5(10):225. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.02.25. Ann Transl Med. 2017. PMID: 28603740 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical