Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program
- PMID: 19643312
- PMCID: PMC2760436
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.080
Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Program
Abstract
Objectives: Our purpose was to determine factors independently associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral, which are currently not well described at a national level.
Background: Substantial numbers of eligible patients are not referred to cardiac rehabilitation at hospital discharge despite proven reductions in mortality and national guideline recommendations.
Methods: We used data from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines program, analyzing 72,817 patients discharged alive after a myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery between January 2000 and September 2007 from 156 hospitals. We identified factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral at discharge and performed multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for clustering, to identify which factors were independently associated with cardiac rehabilitation referral.
Results: Mean age was 64.1 +/- 13.0 years, 68% were men, 79% were white, and 30% had diabetes, 66% hypertension, and 52% dyslipidemia; mean body mass index was 29.1 +/- 6.3 kg/m(2), and mean ejection fraction 49.0 +/- 13.6%. All patients were admitted for coronary artery disease (CAD), with 71% admitted for myocardial infarction. Overall, only 40,974 (56%) were referred to cardiac rehabilitation at discharge, ranging from 53% for myocardial infarction to 58% for percutaneous coronary intervention and to 74% for coronary artery bypass graft patients. Older age, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and the presence of most comorbidities were associated with decreased odds of cardiac rehabilitation referral.
Conclusions: Despite strong evidence for benefit, only 56% of eligible CAD patients discharged from these hospitals were referred to cardiac rehabilitation. Increased physician awareness about the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation and initiatives to overcome barriers to referral are critical to improve the quality of care of patients with CAD.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery, and Valve Surgery: Data From the Clinical Outcomes Assessment Program.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jun;10(6):e003364. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003364. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017. PMID: 28619725
-
Temporal Trends and Factors Associated With Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral Among Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: Findings From Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 25;66(8):917-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.1089. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26293762
-
Gaps in referral to cardiac rehabilitation of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):2079-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.063. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25975470
-
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006. PMID: 16909697 Review.
-
Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Death and Myocardial Infarction Stratified by Stable and Unstable Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Feb;13(2):e006363. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006363. Epub 2020 Feb 17. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32063040 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Successful Implementation and Development of a Phase II Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: A China-Wide Cross-Sectional Study Tracking In-service Training Clinical Staff.Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 17;9:639273. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.639273. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33816424 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Cardiovascular rehabilitation].Internist (Berl). 2010 Oct;51(10):1231-2, 1234, 1236-8. doi: 10.1007/s00108-010-2623-4. Internist (Berl). 2010. PMID: 20848073 German.
-
Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs?J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Oct 21;2(5):e000418. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000418. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013. PMID: 24145743 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation: Effect Modification by Household Income.J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025591. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025591. Epub 2022 Jun 22. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35730601 Free PMC article.
-
Prioritization, Development, and Validation of American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Performance Measures.J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018 Jul;38(4):208-214. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000358. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2018. PMID: 29944573 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wenger NK. Current status of cardiac rehabilitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1619–1631. - PubMed
-
- Witt BJ, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:988–996. - PubMed
-
- Williams MA, Ades PA, Hamm LF, et al. Clinical evidence for a health benefit from cardiac rehabilitation: An update. Am Heart J. 2006;152:835–841. - PubMed
-
- Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction) 2004. [Accessed on June 23, 2008]. Available at www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/semi/index.pdf. - PubMed
-
- Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Physicians, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1–e157. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous