Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807.

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q

Andrea L Pusic  1 , Anne F Klassen, Amie M Scott, Jennifer A Klok, Peter G Cordeiro, Stefan J Cano
Affiliations

Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q

Andrea L Pusic et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Measuring patient-reported outcomes has become increasingly important in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. The objective of this study was to develop a new patient-reported outcome measure to assess the unique outcomes of breast surgery patients.

Methods: Patient interviews, focus groups, expert panels, and a literature review were used to develop a conceptual framework and a list of questionnaire items. Three procedure-specific questionnaires (augmentation, reduction, and reconstruction) were developed and cognitive debriefing interviews used to pilot each questionnaire. Revised questionnaires were field tested with 1950 women at five centers in the United States and Canada (response rate, 72 percent); 491 patients also completed a test-retest questionnaire. Rasch measurement methods were used to construct scales, and traditional psychometric analyses, following currently recommended procedures and criteria, were performed to allow for comparison with existing measures.

Results: The conceptual framework included six domains: satisfaction with breasts, overall outcome, and process of care, and psychosocial, physical, and sexual well-being. Independent scales were constructed for these domains. This new patient-reported outcome measure "system" (the BREAST-Q) contains three modules (augmentation, reconstruction, and reduction), each with a preoperative and postoperative version. Each scale fulfilled Rasch and traditional psychometric criteria (including person separation index 0.76 to 0.95; Cronbach's alpha 0.81 to 0.96; and test-retest reproducibility 0.73 to 0.96).

Conclusions: The BREAST-Q can be used to study the impact and effectiveness of breast surgery from the patient's perspective. By quantifying satisfaction and important aspects of health-related quality of life, the BREAST-Q has the potential to support advocacy, quality metrics, and an evidence-based approach to surgical practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL. Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: Current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg. 2004;57:11.
    1. Pusic AL, McCarthy C, Cano SJ, et al. Clinical research in breast surgery: Reduction and postmastectomy reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35:215–226.
    1. Lam M, Klassen A, Montgomery C, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes after surgical correction of pectus excavatum: A comparison of the Ravitch and Nuss procedures. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43:819–825.
    1. Faria F, Guthrie E, Bradbury E, et al. Psychosocial outcome and patient satisfaction following breast reduction surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52:448–452.
    1. Reaby L, Hort L, Vandervord J, et al. Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy: Collaboration of plastic surgeon and medical psychotherapist. Health Care Women Int. 1994;15:361–375.

Publication types