Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Aug;124(2):567-571.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addb8f.

Biomechanical comparison of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs

Sean M Bidic  1 , Anubodh Varshney, Matthew D Ruff, Harry H Orenstein
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Biomechanical comparison of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs

Sean M Bidic et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The authors' group has developed and used a lasso repair as a substitute to the Pulvertaft weave when joining two tendons for tendon grafts and transfers. This study compared the maximum load, weave time, tendon length required, and bulkiness of the lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side repairs.

Methods: Sixty porcine trotter flexor tendons were used to perform 30 repairs--10 lasso, 10 Pulvertaft weave, and 10 side-by-side. The lasso and Pulvertaft repairs were standardized by initial incision locations, whereas side-by-side repair was standardized to a 2.5-cm overlap. An Instron tensiometer machine was used to test repairs to failure. Maximum load was recorded using data-acquisition software. Weave time, tendon length required, and width at the thickest point of each repair were also measured.

Results: The mean maximum load of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side repairs was 155.8, 159.7, and 88.6 N, respectively. Maximum load was equivalent between lasso and Pulvertaft weave repairs. Lasso repair was thicker by 4.9 mm at its widest point than the Pulvertaft weave but, on average, required less than half the weave time and 7 mm less tendon length.

Conclusions: The strength of the lasso tendon repair compared well with the Pulvertaft weave and was more convenient to perform. Side-by-side repair was inferior because of its low maximum load. This study suggests that lasso repair may be an alternative to the Pulvertaft weave in tendon grafts and transfers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Dona E, Turner AWL, Gianoutsos MP, Walsh WR. Biomechanical properties of four circumferential flexor tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg (Am.) 2003;28:824–831.
    1. Elhassan B, Moran SL, Bravo C, Amadio P. Factors that influence the outcome of zone I and zone II flexor tendon repairs in children. J Hand Surg (Am.) 2006;31:1661–1666.
    1. Yuen JC, Prince M, Hochberg J. Primary repair of zone II flexor tendon lacerations at 5 weeks and 5 days after injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:1628–1629.
    1. Strickland JW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: Twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg (Am.) 2000;25:214–235.
    1. Barrie KA, Wolfe SW, Shean C, Shenbagamurthi D, Slade JF, Panjabi MM. A biomechanical comparison of multistrand flexor tendon repairs using an in situ testing model. J Hand Surg (Am.) 2000;25:499–506.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources