Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jul 31:10:55.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-55.

GPs' reasons for referral of patients with chest pain: a qualitative study

Rudi Bruyninckx  1 , Ann Van den Bruel, Karin Hannes, Frank Buntinx, Bert Aertgeerts
Affiliations
Comparative Study

GPs' reasons for referral of patients with chest pain: a qualitative study

Rudi Bruyninckx et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Prompt diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome is very important and urgent referral to a hospital is imperative because fast treatment can be life-saving and increase the patient's life expectancy and quality of life. The aim of our study was to identify GPs' reasons for referring or not referring patients presenting with chest pain.

Methods: In a semi-structured interview, 21 GPs were asked to describe why they do or do not refer a patient presenting with chest pain. Interviews were taped, transcribed and qualitatively analysed.

Results: Histories of 21 patients were studied. Six were not referred, seven were referred to a cardiologist and eight to the emergency department. GPs' reasons for referral were background knowledge about the patient, patient's age and cost-benefit estimation, the perception of a negative attitude from the medical rescue team, recent patient contact with a cardiologist without detection of a coronary disease and the actual presentation of signs and symptoms, gut feeling, clinical examination and ECG results.

Conclusion: This study suggests that GPs believe they do not exclusively use the 'classical' signs and symptoms in their decision-making process for patients presenting with chest pain. Background knowledge about the patient, GPs' personal ideas and gut feeling are also important.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Panju A, Hemmelgarn B, Guyatt G, Simel D. The rational clinical examination. Is this patient having a myocardial infarction? JAMA. 1998;280:1256–3. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.14.1256. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mant J, McManus R, Oakes R, Delaney B, Barton P, Deeks J, Hammersley L, Davies R, Davies M, Hobbs F. Systematic review and modeling of the investigation of acute and chronic chest pain presenting in primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–158. - PubMed
    1. Departments of Health . National Service Framework of Coronary Heart Disease: Modern standards and service models. London, HMSO; 2000.
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Acute coronary syndromes. A national clinical guideline 93. Edinburgh, Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh; 2007.
    1. Snow V, Barry P, Fihn S, Gibbons R, Owens D, Williams S, Mottur-Pilson C, Weiss K, American College of Physicians; American College of Cardiologic Chronic Stable Angina Panel Evaluation of primary care patients with chronic stable angina: guidelines from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:57–64. - PubMed

Publication types