Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 3:8:28.
doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-28.

A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine

Gunilla Risberg  1 , Eva E Johansson, Katarina Hamberg
Affiliations

A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine

Gunilla Risberg et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

During the last decades research has reported unmotivated differences in the treatment of women and men in various areas of clinical and academic medicine. There is an ongoing discussion on how to avoid such gender bias. We developed a three-step-theoretical model to understand how gender bias in medicine can occur and be understood. In this paper we present the model and discuss its usefulness in the efforts to avoid gender bias. In the model gender bias is analysed in relation to assumptions concerning difference/sameness and equity/inequity between women and men. Our model illustrates that gender bias in medicine can arise from assuming sameness and/or equity between women and men when there are genuine differences to consider in biology and disease, as well as in life conditions and experiences. However, gender bias can also arise from assuming differences when there are none, when and if dichotomous stereotypes about women and men are understood as valid. This conceptual thinking can be useful for discussing and avoiding gender bias in clinical work, medical education, career opportunities and documents such as research programs and health care policies. Too meet the various forms of gender bias, different facts and measures are needed. Knowledge about biological differences between women and men will not reduce bias caused by gendered stereotypes or by unawareness of health problems and discrimination associated with gender inequity. Such bias reflects unawareness of gendered attitudes and will not change by facts only. We suggest consciousness-rising activities and continuous reflections on gender attitudes among students, teachers, researchers and decision-makers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Assumptions about women and men in relation to perceptions of difference/sameness and equity/inequity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Approaches to gender in relation to assumptions of difference/sameness and equity/inequity between women and men.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The risk of gender bias in relation to assumptions about difference/sameness and equity/inequity between women and men.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rubin G. The traffic in women: notes on the political economy of sex. In: Reiter RR, editor. Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press; 1975. pp. 157–210.
    1. West C, Zimmerman DH. Doing gender. Gender Soc. 1987;1:125–151. doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002. - DOI
    1. Lundgren E. Feminist theory and violent empiricism. Avebury: Aldershot, UK & Brookfield, USA; 1995.
    1. Cassel J. Doing gender, doing surgery: women surgeons in a man's profession. Human Organization. 1997;56:47–52.
    1. Moynihan C. Theories in health care and research. Theories of masculinity. BMJ. 1998;317:1072–1075. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources