Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;70(4):793-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.05.023. Epub 2009 Jul 31.

EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections

Affiliations

EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections

Jessica M Trevino et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Although several large series have reported on EUS-guided transgastric and transduodenal drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), only commentary on individual cases has been presented on EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of PFCs.

Objective: To evaluate the technical success and safety of EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of PFCs.

Design: Observational study.

Setting: Tertiary academic referral center.

Patients: This study involved 3 consecutive patients referred for EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of PFCs over a 3-year period.

Interventions: The PFCs were accessed via the transesophageal route under EUS-guidance by using a 19-gauge needle. After a 0.035-inch guidewire was passed into the PFC, and the transmural tract was dilated to 6 mm, a transmural stent and/or drainage catheter was deployed.

Main outcome measurements: Evaluation of the technical and treatment success and safety profile of EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of PFCs.

Results: Three male patients (mean age 57.8 years [range 49-75 years]) underwent EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of PFCs (2 pseudocyst, 1 abscess) over a 3-year period. The etiology of the PFC was alcohol abuse in 2 patients and postsurgical in 1. The mean size of the PFCs was 7 cm (range 6-8 cm) in its largest dimension. The procedures were technically successful in all 3 patients, and no complications were encountered. All 3 patients had a successful treatment outcome. At a mean follow-up period of 24 months (range 12-36 months), all patients were doing well, without any evidence of PFC recurrence.

Limitation: Small number of patients.

Conclusions: In experienced hands, EUS-guided transesophageal drainage of PFCs is technically feasible and safe and is associated with favorable clinical outcomes. A long-term follow-up with larger numbers of patients is required to determine whether the procedure could be an effective alternative to surgical cyst-enterostomy or percutaneous drainage techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources