Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2009 Jul;70(4):297-305.
doi: 10.1007/s00056-009-9909-y. Epub 2009 Aug 2.

Comparison of skeletal and conventional anchorage methods in conjunction with pre-operative decompensation of a skeletal class III malocclusion

[Article in English, German]
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Comparison of skeletal and conventional anchorage methods in conjunction with pre-operative decompensation of a skeletal class III malocclusion

[Article in English, German]
Benedict Wilmes et al. J Orofac Orthop. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background and objective: When treating pronounced dentoalveolar compensation of a skeletal Class III malocclusion, preoperative decompensation frequently requires the extraction of maxillary lateral teeth and retraction of the incisors. In this context, maximum anchorage of the maxillary molars is frequently necessary to attain the significant increase in negative overjet that is desired. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of conventional and skeletal molar anchorage using mini-implants in association with pre-operative decompensation.

Patients and methods: Pre-operative decompensation involved the symmetric extraction of two lateral teeth from the maxilla as well as retraction of the front teeth in each of 20 patients with a marked skeletal Class III. The molar anchorage half of the patients received was conventional (transpalatal arch) while the other half were treated with skeletal anchorage via mini-implants inserted in the anterior palate. Study models were prepared and analyzed using a 3D scanner before and after space closure (OrthoProof). We analyzed the bilateral degree of mesial molar migration and change in the transversal dimension (DigiModel software).

Results: All patients demonstrated mesial migration of the upper molars as a response to the load on the anchorage unit. The 4.21 mm (+/- 1.17 mm) anchorage loss associated with conventional anchorage was greater than that of skeletal anchorage in the anterior palate (2.05 mm [+/- 1.39 mm]). We observed a tendency towards transversal expansion in the molar region according to the design and thickness of the transpalatal arch.

Conclusions: Skeletal molar anchorage proved to be more effective than the conventional anchorage. Hence, skeletal anchorage is preferable, especially when patients are in serious need of preoperative decompensation. The anterior palate has proven to be an advantageous region for insertion in conjunction with the correct mechanics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Apr;129(4):551-4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Feb;95(2):99-106 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):803-10 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod. 1974 Aug;66(2):140-71 - PubMed
    1. Angle Orthod. 2003 Aug;73(4):401-10 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources