Collision error avoidance: influence of proportion congruency and sensorimotor memory on open-loop grasp control
- PMID: 19649623
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1939-6
Collision error avoidance: influence of proportion congruency and sensorimotor memory on open-loop grasp control
Abstract
Grasping behaviour involves the integration of current and historical knowledge about an object, a process that can be influenced by sensory uncertainty. In the present study, participants simultaneously interacted with a visual cue and a haptic cue before reaching to grasp a target object. The visual cue was either congruent (equal in size to haptic cue and target) or incongruent (larger than haptic cue and target). To enhance sensory uncertainty, we manipulated the proportion of congruent trials to be either 80 or 20%. We compared grasp kinematics and forces between congruent and incongruent trials and between the 20 and 80% proportion congruency groups. We also studied the effects of trial history by comparing the performance of congruent and incongruent trials preceded by either the same or opposite trial type. Proportion congruency did not affect temporal kinematics but did affect maximum grip aperture (MGA) as the 80% proportion congruency group used a greater MGA, regardless of trial type. For grasping forces, an interaction effect showed that the 20% proportion congruency group used a greater peak load force on congruent trials. Incongruent trials that followed congruent trials had decreased movement time, increased MGA and increased grasping forces, relative to those that followed incongruent trials. We interpret the data to suggest that the grasp control system integrates multisensory information using flexible, yet specific criteria regarding task constraints. The prevention of collision error (i.e., an inadequate MGA when contacting the target) may be one guiding principle in the control process.
Similar articles
-
The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.Cognition. 2015 May;138:49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.012. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Cognition. 2015. PMID: 25704582
-
Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.Exp Brain Res. 2015 Jul;233(7):2029-40. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4274-0. Epub 2015 Apr 14. Exp Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 25869741
-
Odor Modulates Hand Movements in a Reach-to-Grasp Task.Front Neurosci. 2020 Jun 16;14:560. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00560. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32612498 Free PMC article.
-
Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.Learn Mem. 2004 May-Jun;11(3):356-63. doi: 10.1101/lm.71804. Learn Mem. 2004. PMID: 15169866 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The integration of action-oriented multisensory information from target and limb within the movement planning and execution.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Aug;151:105228. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105228. Epub 2023 May 16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023. PMID: 37201591 Review.
Cited by
-
Differential Effects of Parietal and Cerebellar Stroke in Response to Object Location Perturbation.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 13;9:293. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00293. eCollection 2015. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26217208 Free PMC article.
-
Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the parietal operculum disrupts haptic memory for grasping.Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4262-71. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22915. Epub 2015 Aug 7. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015. PMID: 26248663 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical