Index to predict 5-year mortality of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older using data from the National Health Interview Survey
- PMID: 19649678
- PMCID: PMC2762505
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1073-y
Index to predict 5-year mortality of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older using data from the National Health Interview Survey
Abstract
Background: Prognostic information is becoming increasingly important for clinical decision-making.
Objective: To develop and validate an index to predict 5-year mortality among community-dwelling older adults.
Design and participants: A total of 24,115 individuals aged >65 who responded to the 1997-2000 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) with follow-up through 31 December 2002 from the National Death Index; 16,077 were randomly selected for the development cohort and 8,038 for the validation cohort.
Measurements: 39 risk factors (functional measures, illnesses, behaviors, demographics) were included in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to determine factors independently associated with mortality. Risk scores were calculated for participants using points derived from the final model's beta coefficients. To evaluate external validity, we compared survival by quintile of risk between the development and validation cohorts.
Results: Seventeen percent of participants had died by the end of the study. The final model included 11 variables: age (1 point for 70-74 up to 7 points for >85); male: 3 points; BMI <25: 2 points; perceived health (good: 1 point, fair/poor: 2 points); emphysema: 2 points; cancer: 2 points; diabetes: 2 points; dependent in instrumental activities of daily living: 2 points; difficulty walking: 3 points; smoker-former: 1 point, smoker-current: 3 points; past year hospitalizations-one: 1 point, >2: 3 points. We observed close agreement between 5-year mortality in the two cohorts; which ranged from 5% in the lowest risk quintile to 50% in the highest risk quintile in the validation cohort.
Conclusions: This validated mortality index can be used to account for participant life expectancy in analyses using NHIS data.
Figures


References
-
- US Census Bureau. Current Population Survey, July 2002. Washington, DC: US. Census Bureau; 2002. Accessed at www.census.gov in July 13, 2009.
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC2562733', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2562733/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '18591633', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18591633/'}]}
- Huang ES, Zhang Q, Gandra N, Chin MH, Meltzer DO. The effect of comorbid illness and functional status on the expected benefits of intensive glucose control in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a decision analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;141:11–9. - PMC - PubMed
-
- National Health Interview Survey. National Center for Health Statistics. [Public use data file and documentation]. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis. Accessed July 13, 2009.
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '1430881', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1430881/'}]}
- Mor V, Pacala JT, Rakowski W. Mammography for older women: who uses, who benefits. J Gerontol. 1992;47 Spec No:43–9. - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52462.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52462.x'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15450046', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15450046/'}]}
- Schonberg MA, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Hamel MB. Breast cancer screening in women aged 80 and older: results from a national survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(10):1688–95. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous