This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2009 Aug;91(8):2010.

doi: 10.2106/JBJS.9108.ebo443.

Total elbow arthroplasty did not differ from open reduction and internal fixation with regard to reoperation rates

Bernard F Morrey¹

Affiliations

PMID: 19651961
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.9108.ebo443

Comment

Total elbow arthroplasty did not differ from open reduction and internal fixation with regard to reoperation rates

Bernard F Morrey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Aug.

. 2009 Aug;91(8):2010.

doi: 10.2106/JBJS.9108.ebo443.

Author

Bernard F Morrey¹

Affiliation

¹ Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

PMID: 19651961
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.9108.ebo443

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction--internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients.
McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, McCormack R, Perey B, Goetz T, Zomar M, Moon K, Mandel S, Petit S, Guy P, Leung I. McKee MD, et al. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Sep 26. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009. PMID: 18823799 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Wolters Kluwer