Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 7;15(29):3603-10.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3603.

Transcriptional down regulation of hTERT and senescence induction in HepG2 cells by chelidonine

Affiliations

Transcriptional down regulation of hTERT and senescence induction in HepG2 cells by chelidonine

Sakineh Kazemi Noureini et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the potential effects of chelidonine, the main alkaloid of Chelidonium majus, on telomerase activity and its regulation in HepG2 cells.

Methods: Cytotoxicity of chelidonine for HepG2 cells was determined by neutral red assay. A modified polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based telomerase repeat amplification protocol was used to estimate relative telomerase activity in chelidonine-treated cells in comparison with the untreated control cells. Relative expression level of the catalytic subunit of telomerase (hTERT) gene and P-glycoprotein (pgp) were estimated using semi-quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Cell senescence in treated cells was demonstrated using a beta-galactosidase test.

Results: Cytotoxicity of chelidonine in HepG2 cells was not dose-dependent and tended to reach plateau immediately after the living cells were reduced in number to slightly higher than 50%. However, 12 micromol/L concentration of chelidonine was considered as LD(50), where the maximal attainable effects were realized. Real-time RT-PCR data showed that the expression of pgp increased three-fold in chelidonine treated HepG2 cells in comparison with the untreated controls. Morphologically, treated HepG2 cells showed apoptotic features after 24 h and a small fraction of cells appeared with single blister cell death. The relative expression level of Bcl-2 dropped to less than 50% of control cells at a sub-apoptotic concentration of chelidonine and subsequently increased to higher than 120% at LD(50). Telomerase activity was reduced considerably after administration of very low doses of chelidonine, whereas higher concentrations of chelidonine did not remarkably enhance the effect. Real-time RT-PCR experiments indicated a drastic decrease in expression level of hTERT subunit of telomerase under treatment with chelidonine. Repeated treatment of cells with very low doses of chelidonine caused a decline in growth rate by 4 wk and many of the cells appeared to be aged with large volume and dark staining in the beta-galactosidase assay.

Conclusion: Chelidonine reduces telomerase activity through down-regulation of hTERT expression. Senescence induction might not be directly caused by reducing telomerase activity as it occurs after a few population doublings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The effect of chelidonine on the growth of HepG2 cells after 48 h exposure. Viability of cells at each concentration of chelidonine was evaluated by neutral red uptake test and is expressed as a percentage relative to untreated control cells. The values presented are the mean ± SD of six repeats each one in triplicate.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Morphological changes in HepG2 cells after 48 h treatment with 12 μmol/L chelidonine (LD50) visualized by phase contrast microscopy. A: Apoptotic cells (black arrows) and a few cells undergoing blister cell death (white arrows) are clearly seen; B: Untreated control HepG2 cells.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Induction of DNA fragmentation in HepG2 cells after 48 h treatment with different concentrations of chelidonine. The concentration of chelidonine is indicated at the top of each well.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Telomerase activity using TRAP assay in HepG2 control and 48 h treated cells with different concentration of chelidonine up to LD50. A: The relative activity of treated cells against untreated control cells are indicated as mean ± SD; B: TRAP products resolved on non-denaturing PAGE and stained with SYBR Green. The concentration of chelidonine is indicated on top of each well in μmol/L. C+: Positive control; C-: Negative control.
Figure 5
Figure 5
HepG2 cells were treated for 48 h with medium supplemented with solvent (ethanol, not exceeding 0.1%) or 0.1, 10 and 50 μmol/L chelidonine. Relative hTERT gene expression as measured by real-time RT-PCR which was calibrated with the constitutive expression of β2-microglobulin gene. hTERT level in control samples was considered as 100%. The values indicated as mean ± SD (n ≥ 6).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Number of population doublings after long-term treatment with a sub-apoptotic dose of chelidonine (0.1 μmol/L) or recovered cells after 48 h exposure to LD50 concentration of chelidonine in comparison with control HepG2 cells. In re-treatment experiments (long-term treatment) HepG2 cells were exposed to 0.1 μmol/L only 48 h in each passage and followed by recovery with normal medium devoid of chelidonine. Each point indicates the mean value of a duplicated experiment.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The morphological changes and induction of senescence in HepG2 cells in a long-term treatment experiment. A: HepG2 cells after treatment five times with 0.1 μmol/L chelidonine; B: Cells retreated five times stained for β-galactosidase activity; C: Stained control cells.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Relative expression of Bcl-2 gene in HepG2 cells after 48 h treatment with different concentrations of chelidonine in relation to untreated control cells assessed by real-time RT-PCR and calibrated with β2-microglobulin gene expression. The expression level of Bcl-2 in control cells was considered as 100%. mean ± SD are indicated (n = 3).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Relative expression level of P-glycoprotein in HepG2 cells 48 h after treatment with different concentrations of chelidonine. Each bar indicates the mean ± SD (n = 3).

References

    1. Niu CQ, He LY. Determination of isoquinoline alkaloids in Chelidonium majus L. by ion-pair high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. 1991;542:193–199.
    1. Colombo ML, Bosisio E. Pharmacological activities of Chelidonium majus L. (Papaveraceae) Pharmacol Res. 1996;33:127–134. - PubMed
    1. Biswas SJ, Bhattacharjee N, Khuda-Bukhsh AR. Efficacy of a plant extract (Chelidonium majus L.) in combating induced hepatocarcinogenesis in mice. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:1474–1487. - PubMed
    1. Hohenwarter O, Strutzenberger K, Katinger H, Liepins A, Nowicky JW. Selective inhibition of in vitro cell growth by the anti-tumour drug Ukrain. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1992;18 Suppl:1–4. - PubMed
    1. Liepins A, Nowicky JW. Ukrain is selectively cytostatic and/ or cytotoxic to human tumor and HIV-infected cells, but not to normal human cells. In: D Adam, T Buchner, E Rubinstein., editors. Recent Advances in Chemotherapy. Futuramed Publishers: Munich; 1992. pp. 2660–2661.

MeSH terms