Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 15;69(16):6615-23.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0685. Epub 2009 Aug 4.

Antigen presented by tumors in vivo determines the nature of CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity

Affiliations

Antigen presented by tumors in vivo determines the nature of CD8+ T-cell cytotoxicity

Anil Shanker et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The biological relevance of the perforin and Fas ligand (FasL) cytolytic pathways of CD8(+) T lymphocytes (CTL) for cancer immunotherapy is controversial. We investigated the importance of these pathways in a murine renal cell carcinoma expressing influenza viral hemagglutinin as a defined surrogate antigen (Renca-HA). Following Renca-HA injection, all FasL-dysfunctional FasL(gld/gld) mice (n = 54) died from Renca-HA tumors by day 62. By contrast, perforin(-/-) (51%; n = 45) and Fas(lpr/lpr) (55%; n = 51) mice remained tumor-free at day 360. Blocking FasL in vivo inhibited tumor rejection in these mice. Moreover, established Renca-HA tumors were cleared more efficiently by adoptively transferred HA(518-526)-specific T-cell receptor-transgenic CTL using FasL rather than perforin. Strikingly, a range of mouse tumor cells presenting low concentrations of immunogenic peptide were all preferentially lysed by the FasL but not the Pfp-mediated effector pathway of CTL, whereas at higher peptide concentrations, the preference in effector pathway usage by CTL was lost. Interestingly, a number of human renal cancer lines were also susceptible to FasL-mediated cytotoxicity. Therefore, the FasL cytolytic pathway may be particularly important for eradicating Fas-sensitive tumors presenting low levels of MHC class I-associated antigens following adoptive T-cell therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Antitumor role of Fas ligand in vivo
Tumor cells were injected in BALB/c WT, SCID, Pfp−/−, FasLgld/gld and Faslpr/lpr mice. (A) Survival of Renca-HA (1 × 104 subcutaneous) tumor-bearing SCID (n = 43), WT (n = 55), Pfp−/− (n = 45), FasLgld/gld (n = 54) and Faslpr/lpr (n = 51) mice. *P <0.0001 (WT compared to SCID; or Pfp−/− or Faslpr/lpr compared to FasLgld/gld) (two-sided log-rank test). (B) Lung metastases counts on day 14 following tumor (0.5 × 106 intravenous) injection. In some groups, mice were administered intraperitoneally with mAb MFL4 against Fas ligand or its isotype IgG (0.5 mg each) on day 0, 3, 7 and 10. *P < 0.0001 (ANOVA, two-sided) for WT (n = 23), Faslpr/lpr (n = 18) and Pfp−/− (n = 23) compared to SCID (n = 13) or FasLgld/gld (n = 18), or for MFL4-treated WT (n = 13), Pfp−/− (n = 13) or Faslpr/lpr (n = 8) compared to equal numbers of control isotype-treated mice. Data from 7 (A), and 6 (B) independent experiments.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Activation of CTL in Renca-HA-bearing mice
(A) Lung metastases counts on day 14 following Renca-HA (3 × 106 intravenous) in BALB/c WT, Tg, TgPfp−/− and Tggld/gld mice. *P < 0.0001 (ANOVA, two-sided) for Tg (n = 8) and TgPfp−/− (n = 9) compared to WT (n = 8) and Tggld/gld (n = 9) mice (pool of 2 independent experiments). **P < 0.0001 for Tggld/gld compared to WT. (B) Total number of cells ± SD in tumor-draining (axillary and inguinal) and contralateral LN harvested on day 7 post Renca-HA (5 × 106 subcutaneous) injection in WT, Tg, TgPfp−/− and Tggld/gld mice (n = 4). *P < 0.0001 (ANOVA, two-sided) for the draining LN compared to the contralateral LN. (C) Dot plots of Kd:HA-tetramer versus CD25, CD44 and intracellular IFN-γ on gated CD8+ cells in the tumor-draining LN. Numbers in the quadrants represent % positive cells. Plots representative of 2 independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Fas ligand effector pathway is more efficient than Pfp in vivo
Lung metastases counts on day 14 following Renca-HA (2 × 106 intravenous) injection in RAG2−/− mice (A) that were transferred with the indicated numbers of the activated TgPfp−/− and Tggld/gld LN CTL intravenously on day 7; *P = 0.004, **P < 0.0001 (ANOVA, two-sided) for Pfp−/− (n = 10) compared to the corresponding gld (n = 10) group; (B) that were administered with FasL-neutralizing MFL4 or its isotype IgG on day 0, 2 and 5 post transfer of the activated Tg and TgPfp−/− CTL (0.1 × 106). *P < 0.0001 (ANOVA, two-sided) for MFL4-treated (n = 9) compared to the corresponding control Ab-treated (n = 9) group. (C) The activated TgPfp−/− and Tggld/gld LN CTL (5 × 106 intravenous) were transferred intravenously in RAG2−/− mice bearing 10-day-established Renca-HA tumor metastases. Representative sections of lungs and WT mouse control thymus harvested a day after CTL transfer and stained with CD8α antibody. Bar = 25 µm, all images. Data representative of 2 independent experiments. (D) Bar graphs depict IFN-γ secretion in the day 4 supernatants from the HA-stimulated Tg, TgPfp−/− and Tggld/gld LN CTL cultures. Values are means ± SD of triplicate samples in a representative of two independent experiments. Histograms represent the % expression of granzyme B, perforin and FasL on gated CD8+ TCR Vβ8.1+ cells in the HA-stimulated Tg LN CTL as compared to naïve Tg LN T cells, with numbers depicting the mean fluorescence intensities for naïve (red) and activated (green) Tg T cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Renca-HA tumor cells express Fas in vivo
(A) Fas (M-20)-stained sections (20× magnification) of Renca-HA solid tumors from Faslpr/lpr and FasLgld/gld mice, Faslpr/lpr thymus (negative control) and WT mice (positive control). Bar = 25 µm, all images. (B) Dot plots of Fas (Jo2) versus MHC class-I Kd (right panel) on gated HA+ cells (left panel) in the tumor cells isolated from day-12-established Renca-HA tumors in RAG2−/− mice. Numbers represent % positive cells. (C) Dot plots of Fas versus MHC class-I Kd (right panel) on Renca-HA or Renca tumor cells treated overnight with medium or with 500 U/ml of TNF-α and IFN-γ. Numbers represent % positive cells. Data representative of 2 independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5. FasL and Pfp effector pathways play non-redundant roles
(A) Percent specific lysis of Renca-HA or Renca cells, pre-treated with TNF-α and IFN-γ (500 U/ml each, overnight), pulsed with various concentrations of HA peptide and then incubated for 18 h with activated Tg, TgPfp−/− and Tggld/gld CTL at effector:target ratio 25:1. *P < 0.001 (two-sided unpaired t test) with respect to other CTL. (B) Percent specific lysis of Renca-HA cells pulsed with 10−6 M HA peptide by Tggld/gld CTL pretreated 2 h with medium or with concanamycin A (upper panel). Percent specific lysis of Renca-HA cells pre-treated with medium or with TNF-α and IFN-γ (500 U/ml each, overnight) by TgPfp−/− CTL in the presence of FasL-neutralizing Ab or its isotype control (lower panel). *P < 0.001 (two-sided unpaired t test) with respect to medium or isotype control. (C) Percent specific lysis of 4T1, C-26 and A-20 tumor cells pulsed with 10−10 M (lo) or 10−6 M (hi) HA peptide at effector:target ratio 25:1. *P < 0.001 (two-sided unpaired t test) with respect to the respective lysis values by Tg or TgPfp−/− CTL. (D) Percent decrease in cell number of medium− or human-TNF-α− and IFN-γ (100 U/ml, overnight)−pretreated human renal cancer lines ACHN, TK-10 and UO-31 incubated with pan-caspase inhibitor zVAD-FMK or control analog zFA-FMK (20 µM) one hour before the treatment with FasL (100 ng/ml). *P < 0.001 (two-sided unpaired t test) with respect to the control. Values are means ± SD (n = 3) from a representative of 6 (A), 2 (B, and C) and 3 (D) independent experiments.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Antigen density on tumor targets influences CTL response and effector cell degranulation
(A) Gating schematic for sorting of HAnegative, HAlow, HAintermediate and HAhigh cells in Renca-HA cells following staining with HA-specific H28-E23 Ab. (B and C) Percent specific lysis of sorted or unsorted Renca-HA cells by activated Tg CTL in the presence of medium, concanamycin A, FasL-neutralizing Ab, MFL4, or a combination of concanamycin A and MFL4. *P < 0.001 (two-sided unpaired t test) with respect to respective control groups. (D) Dot plots of TCR Vβ8.1 versus CD107a on Tg CTL following incubation with sorted Renca-HA tumor cells for 6 h in the presence of monensin. Numbers represent % positive cells. Plots representative of 3 independent experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME. Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:299–308. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang JC, Childs R. Immunotherapy for renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5576–5583. - PubMed
    1. Sayers TJ, Brooks AD, Lee JK, et al. Molecular mechanisms of immune-mediated lysis of murine renal cancer: differential contributions of perforin-dependent versus Fas-mediated pathways in lysis by NK and T cells. J Immunol. 1998;161:3957–3965. - PubMed
    1. Smyth MJ, Kelly JM, Sutton VR, et al. Unlocking the secrets of cytotoxic granule proteins. J Leukoc Biol. 2001;70:18–29. - PubMed
    1. Henkart PA, Catalfamo M. CD8+ effector cells. Adv Immunol. 2004;83:233–252. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances