Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel
- PMID: 19656148
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02279.x
Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel
Erratum in
- BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):521. McCleery, S [corrected to McChlery, S]
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy and patient satisfaction of three methods of labour induction (double balloon catheters, single balloon catheters and prostaglandin gel) in term nulliparous women with unfavourable cervices.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Population: A total of 330 nulliparous women with unfavourable cervices induced at term.
Methods: Three cervical ripening study arms were used: double balloon catheter (107 women); 16F Foley catheter (110 women) and PGE(2) gel (2 mg) (113 women).
Main outcome measures: Caesarean section, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction.
Results: There was no difference in caesarean delivery rates between groups (double balloon 43%, single balloon 36%, PGE(2) 37%, P = 0.567). The induction to delivery interval was longer in the double balloon group (median 24.5; 95% CI 23.7, 30.6 hours) than the single balloon (23.2; 20.8, 25.8 hours) or PGE(2) (23.8; 21.7, 26.8 hours) (P = 0.043). Uterine hyperstimulation occurred in 14% of the PGE(2) group with none occurring with mechanical cervical ripening. Cord blood gases were worse in the PGE(2) group: median arterial pH double balloon 7.26 (range 7.03-7.40); single balloon 7.26 (7.05-7.44); PGE(2) 7.25 (6.91-7.41) (P = 0.050). Cervical ripening with the single balloon catheter was associated with significantly less pain (pain score > or =4: double balloon 55%, single balloon 36%, PGE(2) 63%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Labour induction in nullipara with unfavourable cervices results in high caesarean delivery rates. Although all methods in this study had similar efficacy, the single balloon catheter offers the best combination of safety and patient comfort.
Comment in
-
Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix.BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):892; author reply 892-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02556.x. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20482541 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix.BJOG. 2010 Jun;117(7):892; author reply 892-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02556.x. BJOG. 2010. PMID: 20482541 No abstract available.
-
Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Apr 1;119(2):189-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.06.039. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005. PMID: 15808378 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravaginal prostaglandin-E2 for cervical priming and induction of labour.East Mediterr Health J. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):855-61. East Mediterr Health J. 2007. PMID: 17955768
-
Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BJOG. 2017 May;124(6):891-899. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14256. Epub 2016 Aug 17. BJOG. 2017. PMID: 27533177
-
Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening.Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):444-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Sep 2. Semin Perinatol. 2015. PMID: 26341067 Review.
Cited by
-
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert in Labor Induction: A Cost-Consequences Model for 5 European Countries-An Economic Evaluation Supported with Literature Review and Retrospective Data Collection.Adv Ther. 2016 Oct;33(10):1755-1770. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0397-3. Epub 2016 Aug 22. Adv Ther. 2016. PMID: 27549327 Free PMC article.
-
Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 16;19(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2491-4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. PMID: 31619189 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges and Limitations of Clinical Trials on Labor Induction: A Review of the Literature.AJP Rep. 2018 Oct;8(4):e365-e378. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676577. Epub 2018 Dec 26. AJP Rep. 2018. PMID: 30591843 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outpatient Induction of Labor - Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021 Jan;81(1):70-80. doi: 10.1055/a-1308-2341. Epub 2021 Jan 19. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021. PMID: 33487667 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Acupressure on Cervical Ripening.Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Aug 24;17(8):e28691. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.28691. eCollection 2015 Aug. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015. PMID: 26430530 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical