A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
- PMID: 19656366
- PMCID: PMC2731071
- DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-48
A method for studying decision-making by guideline development groups
Abstract
Background: Multidisciplinary guideline development groups (GDGs) have considerable influence on UK healthcare policy and practice, but previous research suggests that research evidence is a variable influence on GDG recommendations. The Evidence into Recommendations (EiR) study has been set up to document social-psychological influences on GDG decision-making. In this paper we aim to evaluate the relevance of existing qualitative methodologies to the EiR study, and to develop a method best-suited to capturing influences on GDG decision-making.
Methods: A research team comprised of three postdoctoral research fellows and a multidisciplinary steering group assessed the utility of extant qualitative methodologies for coding verbatim GDG meeting transcripts and semi-structured interviews with GDG members. A unique configuration of techniques was developed to permit data reduction and analysis.
Results: Our method incorporates techniques from thematic analysis, grounded theory analysis, content analysis, and framework analysis. Thematic analysis of individual interviews conducted with group members at the start and end of the GDG process defines discrete problem areas to guide data extraction from GDG meeting transcripts. Data excerpts are coded both inductively and deductively, using concepts taken from theories of decision-making, social influence and group processes. These codes inform a framework analysis to describe and explain incidents within GDG meetings. We illustrate the application of the method by discussing some preliminary findings of a study of a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) acute physical health GDG.
Conclusion: This method is currently being applied to study the meetings of three of NICE GDGs. These cover topics in acute physical health, mental health and public health, and comprise a total of 45 full-day meetings. The method offers potential for application to other health care and decision-making groups.
Similar articles
-
Turning evidence into recommendations: protocol of a study guideline development groups.Implement Sci. 2007 Sep 5;2:29. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-29. Implement Sci. 2007. PMID: 17803806 Free PMC article.
-
"Going into the black box": a policy analysis of how the World Health Organization uses evidence to inform guideline recommendations.Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;12:1292475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292475. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38584925 Free PMC article.
-
Managing conflicts of interest in the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines programme: qualitative study.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0122313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122313. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25811754 Free PMC article.
-
Violence: The Short-Term Management of Disturbed/Violent Behaviour in In-Patient Psychiatric Settings and Emergency Departments.London: Royal College of Nursing (UK); 2005 Feb. London: Royal College of Nursing (UK); 2005 Feb. PMID: 21834187 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
How to develop cost-conscious guidelines.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(16):1-69. doi: 10.3310/hta5160. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11427188 Review.
Cited by
-
Decision-making and evidence use during the process of prenatal record review in Canada: a multiphase qualitative study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Mar 31;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0503-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015. PMID: 25881034 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the process and outcome of the development of practice guidelines and recommendations: PANELVIEW instrument development.CMAJ. 2020 Oct 5;192(40):E1138-E1145. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200193. CMAJ. 2020. PMID: 33020121 Free PMC article.
-
The process of developing evidence-based guidance in medicine and public health: a qualitative study of views from the inside.Implement Sci. 2013 Sep 4;8:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-101. Implement Sci. 2013. PMID: 24006933 Free PMC article.
-
Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest.Implement Sci. 2012 Jul 4;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-60. Implement Sci. 2012. PMID: 22762776 Free PMC article.
-
Human computation as a new method for evidence-based knowledge transfer in Web-based guideline development groups: proof of concept randomized controlled trial.J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jan 17;15(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2055. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 23328663 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- NICE, UK A guide to NICE. 2005. http://www.nice.org.uk/media/EE5/AF/A_Guide_to_NICE_April2005.pdf
-
- Sheldon TA, Cullum N, Dawson D, Lankshear A, Lowson K, Watt I, West P, Wright D, Wright J. What's the evidence that NICE guidance has been implemented? Results from a national evaluation using time series analysis, audit of patients' notes, and interviews. BMJ. 2004;329:999. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7473.999. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources