Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):594-604.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810773.

Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement

Michael Rud Lassen et al. N Engl J Med. .
Free article

Erratum in

  • N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 29;361(18):1814

Abstract

Background: The optimal strategy for thromboprophylaxis after major joint replacement has not been established. Low-molecular-weight heparins such as enoxaparin predominantly target factor Xa but to some extent also inhibit thrombin. Apixaban, a specific factor Xa inhibitor, may provide effective thromboprophylaxis with a low risk of bleeding and improved ease of use.

Methods: In a double-blind, double-dummy study, we randomly assigned patients undergoing total knee replacement to receive 2.5 mg of apixaban orally twice daily or 30 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 hours. Both medications were started 12 to 24 hours after surgery and continued for 10 to 14 days. Bilateral venography was then performed. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of asymptomatic and symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and death from any cause during treatment. Patients were followed for 60 days after anticoagulation therapy was stopped.

Results: A total of 3195 patients underwent randomization, with 1599 assigned to the apixaban group and 1596 to the enoxaparin group; 908 subjects were not eligible for the efficacy analysis. The overall rate of primary events was much lower than anticipated. The rate of the primary efficacy outcome was 9.0% with apixaban as compared with 8.8% with enoxaparin (relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.32). The composite incidence of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was 2.9% with apixaban and 4.3% with enoxaparin (P=0.03).

Conclusions: As compared with enoxaparin for efficacy of thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement, apixaban did not meet the prespecified statistical criteria for noninferiority, but its use was associated with lower rates of clinically relevant bleeding and it had a similar adverse-event profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00371683.)

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis.
    Gómez-Outes A, Suárez-Gea ML, Pozo-Hernández C. Gómez-Outes A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 19;361(21):2100-1; author reply 2101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc091817. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19923583 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data