Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Aug;6(8):415-27.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2009.126.

Erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy: prevention and treatment

Affiliations
Review

Erectile dysfunction following prostatectomy: prevention and treatment

Ahmed Magheli et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy (RP) remains the standard treatment for men with clinically localized prostate cancer, despite the range of alternative treatment modalities. Even with significant advances in surgical technique and superb results for cancer control and preservation of urinary function, erectile dysfunction (ED) following RP is a common complication. This is mainly attributed to temporary cavernous nerve damage (neuropraxia) resulting in penile hypoxia, smooth muscle apoptosis, fibrosis and veno-occlusive dysfunction. One of the most promising new approaches is the concept of early penile rehabilitation, which is thought to prevent ED after RP by countering post-RP pathophysiological changes during the period of neural recovery. Various treatments, such as vacuum constriction devices, intraurethral and intracorporal alprostadil, and phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, might serve to facilitate recovery of erectile function. PDE5 inhibitors are considered as the first-line treatment for early penile rehabilitation, with superior erectile function outcomes compared to placebo. Definitive conclusions regarding the success of penile rehabilitation cannot be drawn at this time because of differences in study design, data acquisition, and definitions of potency. Continued prospective, rigorous study is needed to develop and bring forward this important field and to establish the best evidence basis for counseling and treating patients suffering from ED after RP.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):408-10 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Mar;18(2):173-9 - PubMed
    1. Md Med J. 1990 Apr;39(4):389-93 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1997 Oct;158(4):1408-10 - PubMed
    1. Tissue Eng. 2002 Jul;8(3):515-24 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances