Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;13(8):659-64.
doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0194-7.

Food choice among homebound older adults: motivations and perceived barriers

Affiliations

Food choice among homebound older adults: motivations and perceived barriers

J L Locher et al. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to identify: motivations and perceived barriers associated with food choices made by homebound older adults; whether motivations and perceived barriers vary according to social demographic characteristics; and whether motivations and perceived barriers are associated with dietary quality.

Design: This was an observational study using standard interview methods where participants were administered a questionnaire and completed three 24-hour dietary recalls.

Setting: Participants were interviewed in their homes.

Participants: 185 homebound older adults were included.

Measurement: Motivations were assessed using a modification of The Food Choice Questionnaire and perceived barriers were assessed using the Vailas Food Enjoyment Questionnaire. Participants answered questions regarding social demographic characteristics. Dietary quality measures of adequate intakes of calories, protein, vitamin D, and vitamin B12 were obtained from the three 24-hour dietary recalls.

Results: Mean age was 78.9; 80% were female; and 36% were African American. Key motivations in food choice included sensory appeal, convenience, and price. Key barriers included health, being on a special diet, and being unable to shop. These varied little by social demographics, except for age. Dietary quality varied according to different motivations and barriers.

Conclusion: Food choices are based upon a complex interaction between the social and environmental context, the individual, and the food. Efforts to change eating behaviors, especially community-based interventions involving self-management approaches, must carefully take into account individuals' self-perceived motivations and barriers to food selection. Incorporating foods that are tasty, easy to prepare, inexpensive, and that involve caregivers are critical for successful interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McLeroy K.R., Bibeau D., Steckler A., Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly. 1988;15:351–377. 3068205. - PubMed
    1. Hovell M.F., Wahlgren D.R., Gehrman C. In: New and Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice & Research. DiClemente R.J., Crosby R., Kegler M., editors. Jossey-Bass Inc; San Francisco, California: 2002. The behavioral ecological model: Integrating public health and behavioral science.
    1. Rimer B, Glanz K. Theory at a Glance: A Guide for Health Promotion Practice, 2nd Ed. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. 2005; http://cancer.gov/aboutnci/oc/theory-at-aglance/print
    1. Locher J.L., Sharkey J.S. In: Handbook of Clinical Nutrition and Aging. 2nd Ed. Bales C.W., Ritchie C.S., editors. Humana Press; Totowa, NJ: 2009. An ecological model for understanding eating behavior in older adults.
    1. Locher J.L., Ritchie C.S., Robinson C.O., Roth D.L., West D.S., Burgio K.L. A multidimensional approach to understanding under-eating in homebound older adults: The importance of social factors. The Gerontologist. 2008;48:223–234. 18483434. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types