Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;13(8):724-8.
doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0204-9.

Sarcopenia: clinical evaluation, biological markers and other evaluation tools

Affiliations

Sarcopenia: clinical evaluation, biological markers and other evaluation tools

M Pahor et al. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Sarcopenia is characterized by a lower skeletal muscle quantity, higher fat accumulation in the muscle, lower muscle strength, and lower physical performance. The most commonly used, low cost and accessible methods to assess skeletal muscle mass include dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized tomography (CT) and creatinine excretion are the most specific golden standards for assessing muscle mass or cross sectional muscle area. Other available measures include peripheral quantitative computerized tomography (pQCT), ultrasound and neutron activation. Skeletal muscle strength is another important component for the assessment of sarcopenia and muscle quality. Several methods are available for the measurement of muscle strength which include simple dynamometers to measure isometric strength and the most complex isokinetic strength measures of power and torque. Standardized physical performance measures complement the measures of muscle mass for the assessment of sarcopenia. A clinical definition of sarcopenia ought to use methods of assessment that are valid, reliable, specific to skeletal muscle, predictive of future health events, non-invasive, practical, low cost and widely accessible.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wang Z.M., Visser M., Ma R., Baumgartner R.N., Kotler D., Gallagher D., Heymsfield S.B. Skeletal muscle mass: evaluation of neutron activation and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry methods. J Appl Physiol. 1996;80(3):824–831. 8964743. - PubMed
    1. Proctor D.N., O'Brien P.C., Atkinson E.J., Nair K.S. Comparison of techniques to estimate total body skeletal muscle mass in people of different age groups. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(3Pt1):E489–E495. 10484361. - PubMed
    1. Levine J.A., Abboud L., Barry M., Reed J.E., Sheedy P.F., Jensen M.D. Measuring leg muscle and fat mass in humans: comparison of CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88(2):452–456. 10658010. - PubMed
    1. Visser M., Fuerst T., Lang T., Salamone L., Harris T.B. Validity of fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study—Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Body Composition Working Group. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87(4):1513–1520. 10517786. - PubMed
    1. Janssen I., Baumgartner R.N., Ross R., Rosenberg I.H., Roubenoff R. Skeletal muscle cutpoints associated with elevated physical disability risk in older men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(4):413–421. 10.1093/aje/kwh058 14769646. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types