Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;107(5):1740-50.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04440.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand: a comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands

A B Boehm  1 , J Griffith, C McGee, T A Edge, H M Solo-Gabriele, R Whitman, Y Cao, M Getrich, J A Jay, D Ferguson, K D Goodwin, C M Lee, M Madison, S B Weisberg
Affiliations

Faecal indicator bacteria enumeration in beach sand: a comparison study of extraction methods in medium to coarse sands

A B Boehm et al. J Appl Microbiol. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Aims: The absence of standardized methods for quantifying faecal indicator bacteria (FIB) in sand hinders comparison of results across studies. The purpose of the study was to compare methods for extraction of faecal bacteria from sands and recommend a standardized extraction technique.

Methods and results: Twenty-two methods of extracting enterococci and Escherichia coli from sand were evaluated, including multiple permutations of hand shaking, mechanical shaking, blending, sonication, number of rinses, settling time, eluant-to-sand ratio, eluant composition, prefiltration and type of decantation. Tests were performed on sands from California, Florida and Lake Michigan. Most extraction parameters did not significantly affect bacterial enumeration. anova revealed significant effects of eluant composition and blending; with both sodium metaphosphate buffer and blending producing reduced counts.

Conclusions: The simplest extraction method that produced the highest FIB recoveries consisted of 2 min of hand shaking in phosphate-buffered saline or deionized water, a 30-s settling time, one-rinse step and a 10 : 1 eluant volume to sand weight ratio. This result was consistent across the sand compositions tested in this study but could vary for other sand types.

Significance and impact of the study: Method standardization will improve the understanding of how sands affect surface water quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alm EW, Burke J, Spain A. Fecal indicator bacteria are abundant in wet sand at freshwater beaches. Water Res. 2003;37:3978–3982. - PubMed
    1. Baums IB, Goodwin KD, Kiesling T, Wanless D, Diaz MR, Fell JW. Luminex detection of fecal indicators in river samples, marine recreational water, and beach sand. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;54:521–536. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beversdorf LJ, Bornstein-Forst SM, McLellan SL. The potential of beach sand to serve as a reservoir for Escherichia coli and the physical influences on cell die-off. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:1372–1381. - PubMed
    1. Bonilla TD, Nowosielski K, Cuvelier M, Hartz A, Green M, Esiobu N, McCorquodale DS, Fleisher JM, et al. Prevalence and distribution of fecal indicator organisms in South Florida beach sand and preliminary assessment of health effects associated with beach sand exposure. Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;54:1472–1482. - PubMed
    1. Craig DL, Fallowfield HJ, Cromar NJ. Enumeration of faecal coliforms from recreational coastal sites: evaluation of techniques for the separation of bacteria from sediments. J Appl Microbiol. 2002;93:557–565. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances