Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):165-9.

Expanding the indications for laparoscopic gastric resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Affiliations

Expanding the indications for laparoscopic gastric resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Julio Sokolich et al. JSLS. 2009 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic resection of large gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) has been controversial. This generally has been limited to small lesions. We hypothesize that laparoscopic mobilization and resection using, in some cases, extracorporeal anastomosis of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is an oncologically safe alternative to open surgery even when tumors are large.

Methods: Four patients underwent a laparoscopic approach for gastric GIST tumors >2 cm at Methodist Dallas Medical Center over a 6-month period. Patient demographics, operative findings, postoperative course, and pathologic characteristics were examined.

Results: The mean age in this patient group was 58 years (range, 36 to 77). Gastrointestinal bleeding and dyspepsia were the most common symptoms. Seventy-five percent of the patients were females. Mean tumor size was 10 cm (range, 2.5 to 20) with distribution in the stomach as follows: 75% greater curvature and 25% antrum. Tumors were removed by wedge, sleeve, and partial gastrectomies. Two of these tumors showed a high grade and the other 2 a moderate grade of differentiation. The number of mitoses was <5/50 HPF in all the tumors. No intraoperative spillage occurred in any patients, even with the largest tumor (20 cm). Importantly, all tumors were excised with a negative gross and microscopic margin. Average length of stay was 4 days. No patients required reoperation, and there were no complications postoperatively.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive assisted approaches may be an option to treat large GIST tumors. Obeying principles of minimal touch, no spillage, and obtaining a negative margin, a safe operation with a laparoscopic approach is feasible, even in giant tumors. The large size of diagnosed GIST tumors should not preclude a minimally invasive approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Demonstrating position of the patient and location of the trocars.

References

    1. Nishimura J, Nakajima K, Omori T, et al. Surgical strategy for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: laparoscopic vs. open resection. Surg Endosc. 21:875–878, 2007 - PubMed
    1. Gutierrez JC, De Oliveira LOP, Koniaris LG, et al. Optimizing diagnosis, staging, and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:479–491 - PubMed
    1. Basu S, Balaji S, Bennett DH, Davie N. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and laparoscopic resection. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1685–1689 - PubMed
    1. Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, Lee DH, O'Leary TJ. Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Pathol 1999;23:82–87 - PubMed
    1. Iwahashi M, Takifuji K, Ojima T, et al. Surgical management of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. World J Surg. 2006;30:28–35 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources