Progress in restoration of hearing with the auditory brainstem implant
- PMID: 19660666
- DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17523-4
Progress in restoration of hearing with the auditory brainstem implant
Abstract
Fifty years ago auditory scientists were very skeptical about the potential of new prosthetic approaches that electrically stimulated the auditory nerve, the cochlear nuclei (CN), and the inferior colliculus (IC). In those decades, the basilar membrane was considered to play a fundamental and irreplaceable role as a fine spectrum analyzer in hearing physiology, and therefore it was thought that electrical stimulation of the auditory system would have never produced functionally useful hearing. Over the last 30 years, cochlear implants (CIs) have improved steadily to the point where the average sentence recognition with modern multichannel devices is better than 90% correct. More recently, similar performance has been observed with electric stimulation of the brainstem with auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). However, it is clear that to fully understand hearing and to design the next generation of prosthetic devices we must better understand the ear-brain relationship. Indeed some aspects of hearing do not require the intricate complexities of cochlear physiological responses, while other auditory tasks rely critically on specialized details of cochlear processing. The progress in electrical stimulation of the central auditory system requires us to reconsider the patient selection criteria for different implant devices, in particular to evaluate the possibility of ABIs for etiologies with poor outcomes with CIs. In the present review, the latest outcomes in restoration of hearing with ABI are presented. New guidelines are proposed for device selection for different etiologies and future research is suggested to further refine the process of matching an individual patient to the most appropriate implant device.
Similar articles
-
Neuroprosthetic hearing with auditory brainstem implants.Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004 Apr;49(4):83-7. doi: 10.1515/BMT.2004.017. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004. PMID: 15171587
-
Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Jul;133(1):126-38. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.03.022. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005. PMID: 16025066
-
[Restoration of hearing--comparing auditory brainstem implant to cochlear implant].Brain Nerve. 2007 Apr;59(4):323-9. Brain Nerve. 2007. PMID: 17447518 Review. Japanese.
-
Open set speech perception with auditory brainstem implant?Laryngoscope. 2005 Nov;115(11):1974-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000178327.42926.ec. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 16319608
-
Traditional and emerging indications in cochlear and auditory brainstem implants.Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2005;126(4):287-92. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2005. PMID: 16496561 Review.
Cited by
-
Towards the clinical translation of optogenetic skeletal muscle stimulation.Pflugers Arch. 2020 May;472(5):527-545. doi: 10.1007/s00424-020-02387-0. Epub 2020 May 15. Pflugers Arch. 2020. PMID: 32415463 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tinnitus: Models and mechanisms.Hear Res. 2011 Jun;276(1-2):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 10. Hear Res. 2011. PMID: 21146597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The potential of stem cells for the restoration of auditory function in humans.Regen Med. 2013 May;8(3):309-18. doi: 10.2217/rme.13.32. Regen Med. 2013. PMID: 23627825 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neuronal activity evoked in the inferior colliculus of the cat by surface macroelectrodes and penetrating microelectrodes implanted in the cochlear nucleus.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1765-73. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2046169. Epub 2010 May 17. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010. PMID: 20483692 Free PMC article.
-
Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway.J Clin Invest. 2014 Mar;124(3):1114-29. doi: 10.1172/JCI69050. Epub 2014 Feb 10. J Clin Invest. 2014. PMID: 24509078 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources