Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;98(11):1776-80.
doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01469.x. Epub 2009 Aug 6.

C-reactive protein as a marker of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized febrile infants

Affiliations

C-reactive protein as a marker of serious bacterial infections in hospitalized febrile infants

Efraim Bilavsky et al. Acta Paediatr. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the potential predictive power of C-reactive protein (CRP) as a marker of serious bacterial infection (SBI) in hospitalized febrile infants aged < or =3 months.

Patients and methods: Data on blood CRP levels were collected prospectively on admission for all infants aged < or =3 months who were hospitalized for fever from 2005 to 2008. The patients were divided into two groups by the presence or absence of findings of SBI.

Results: A total of 892 infants met the inclusion criteria, of whom 102 had a SBI. Mean CRP level was significantly higher in the infants who had a bacterial infection than in those who did not (5.3 +/- 6.3 mg/dL vs. 1.3 +/- 2.2 mg/dL, p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80) for CRP compared to 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76) for white blood cell (WBC) count. When analyses were limited to predicting bacteremia or meningitis only, the AUCs for CRP and WBC were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66-0.96) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.42-0.83), respectively.

Conclusion: C-reactive protein is a valuable laboratory test in the assessment of febrile infants aged < or =3 months old and may serve as a better diagnostic marker of SBI than total WBC count.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by