Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;58(11):1649-56.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Aug 6.

Microbial load from animal feces at a recreational beach

Mary E Wright  1 , Helena M Solo-Gabriele, Samir Elmir, Lora E Fleming
Affiliations

Microbial load from animal feces at a recreational beach

Mary E Wright et al. Mar Pollut Bull. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to quantify the microbial load (enterococci) contributed by the different animals that frequent a beach site. The highest enterococci concentrations were observed in dog feces with average levels of 3.9 x 10(7) CFU/g; the next highest enterococci levels were observed in birds averaging 3.3 x 10(5)CFU/g. The lowest measured levels of enterococci were observed in material collected from shrimp fecal mounds (2.0 CFU/g). A comparison of the microbial loads showed that 1 dog fecal event was equivalent to 6940 bird fecal events or 3.2 x 10(8) shrimp fecal mounds. Comparing animal contributions to previously published numbers for human bather shedding indicates that one adult human swimmer contributes approximately the same microbial load as one bird fecal event. Given the abundance of animals observed on the beach, this study suggests that dogs are the largest contributing animal source of enterococci to the beach site.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The study beach was located within Biscayne Bay on Virginia Key, east of Miami, Fl. The focus area is identified as the eastern most 360 m. Bottom inset shows location of camera. Boxes within the bottom inset show grid boxes used for in-field visual counting surveys for dogs and humans. Top inset shows transect and plots used for the in-field visual counting surveys for shrimp.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Enterococci concentrations (per gram of dry feces) from feces from different types of birds and the respective sample size in parenthesis. Error bars represent the standard deviation for the respective type of bird within that sample size.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alderisio KA, DeLuca N. Seasonal enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria from the feces of ring-billed gulls (Larus delawarensis) and Canada geese (Branta canadensis) Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65(12):5628–5630. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson SA, Turner SJ, Lewis GD. Enterococci in the New Zealand environment: implications for water quality monitoring. Water Science and Technology. 1997;35(11–12):325–331.
    1. Bedard J, Therriault JC, Berube J. Assessment of the importance of nutrient recycling by searbirds in the St. Lawrence estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 1980;37:583–588.
    1. Boehm AB, Keymer DP, Shellenbarger GG. An analytical model of enterococci inactivation, grazing, and transport in the surf zone of a marine beach. Water Research. 2005;39(2005):3565–3578. - PubMed
    1. Bonilla TD, Nowosielski K, Cuvelier M, Hartz A, Green M, Esiobu N, McCorquodale DS, Fleisher JM, Rogerson A. Prevalence and distribution of fecal indicator organisms in South Florida beach sand and preliminary assessment of health effects associated with beach sand exposure. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2007;54:1472–1482. - PubMed

Publication types