Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;23(8):543-5.
doi: 10.1155/2009/258041.

The impact of misdiagnosing celiac disease at a referral centre

Affiliations

The impact of misdiagnosing celiac disease at a referral centre

Federico Biagi et al. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

In the past few years, the number of celiac disease diagnoses not confirmed at the Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy, a tertiary referral centre, was particularly high. Therefore, a decision was made to investigate the reasons why these diagnoses were wrong and by whom they had been made. The clinical histories of all celiac patients referred to the centre were re-evaluated. Between December 1998 and January 2007, 614 patients who were diagnosed at other institutions and presumed to be affected by celiac disease attended the tertiary referral outpatient clinic. The histological and serological results allowed for confirmation the diagnosis in 434 patients. In the remaining 180 patients, the initial diagnosis of celiac disease could not be confirmed; therefore, the patients were re-investigated. After re-evaluation, the diagnosis of celiac disease was confirmed in only 61 of these 180 cases. The reasons for incorrect initial diagnosis were analyzed. A mere 80% correct diagnosis rate is a very disappointing result. Although it should be obvious that celiac disease must be investigated with duodenal biopsies and celiac antibody testing, this well-known strategy is not always followed, probably resulting in an incorrect diagnosis.

Au cours des quelques dernières années, à la Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, de Pavie, en Italie, un centre de référence tertiaire, le nombre de diagnostics de maladie cœliaque non confirmés, était particulièrement élevé. Il a donc été décidé d’explorer pourquoi ces diagnostics étaient erronés et par qui ils avaient été posés. L’histoire clinique de tous les patients cœliaques adressés au centre a donc été réévaluée. Entre décembre 1998 et janvier 2007, 614 patients ayant reçu un diagnostic dans d’autres établissements et présumés atteints de maladie cœliaque se sont présentés à la clinique ambulatoire du centre de référence tertiaire. Les résultats histologiques et sérologiques ont permis de confirmer le diagnostic chez 434 patients. Chez les 180 autres patients, le diagnostic initial de maladie cœliaque n’a pas pu être confirmé. Par conséquent, les patients ont subi de nouveaux examens. Après réévaluation, le diagnostic de maladie cœliaque a été confirmé chez 61 patients seulement parmi ces 180 cas. Les raisons du diagnostic initial erroné ont été analysées. Un taux de diagnostics corrects de 80 % est très décevant. Il semble évident que la maladie cœliaque doit faire l’objet d’investigations au moyen de biopsies duodénales et de dosages des anticorps cœliaques, mais cette stratégie pourtant bien connue n’est pas toujours suivie et explique probablement les erreurs de diagnostic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Health care professionals diagnosing celiac disease. Der Dermatologist; GE Gastroenterologist; GP General practitioner; Int Internist; PSD Patient self-diagnosis

References

    1. Mäki M, Mustalahti K, Kokkonen J, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease among children in Finland. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2517–24. - PubMed
    1. Hin H, Bird G, Fisher P, Mahy N, Jewell D. Coeliac disease in primary care: Case finding study. BMJ. 1999;318:164–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shidrawi RG, Przemioslo R, Davies DR, Mahi N, Jewell D. Pitfalls in diagnosing coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47:693–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: Time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185–94. - PubMed
    1. Rostom A, Dubé C, Cranney A, Saloojee N, Sy R, Garritty C. The diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease: A systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:S38–46. - PubMed