Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;24(11):2902-9.
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep290. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Does the estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration have an impact on pregnancy rates in patients treated with rec-FSH/GnRH antagonist?

D Kyrou  1 , B Popovic-Todorovic, H M Fatemi, C Bourgain, P Haentjens, L Van Landuyt, P Devroey
Affiliations

Does the estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration have an impact on pregnancy rates in patients treated with rec-FSH/GnRH antagonist?

D Kyrou et al. Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the association between estradiol (E(2)) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration and pregnancy rates in a recombinant FSH (rec-FSH) antagonist fixed protocol.

Methods: A group of 207 patients (<or=39 years of age), treated by IVF/ICSI, received 200 IU/day rec-FSH from Day 2 of the cycle and daily GnRH antagonist starting on Day 6 of stimulation. The criteria for hCG administration included only the presence of >or=3 follicles of >or=17 mm diameter. One to two embryos were transferred on Day 3 after oocyte retrieval.

Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for E(2) on the day of hCG could not distinguish between pregnant and non-pregnant women (AUC:0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.59). No significant difference was observed between the three percentile groups of E(2) values on the day of hCG administration [group 1, lower 25th percentile (<1142 pg/ml); group 2, medium 50th percentile (1142-2446 pg/ml) and group 3, higher 75th percentile (>2446 pg/ml)] for the ongoing pregnancy rates (P = 0.52). On the contrary, the linear regression model showed that higher E(2) values on the day of hCG administration significantly improved the scores of transferred embryos (P = 0.01) as well as the total embryo score (P = 0.02). Yet subgroup analysis only in this high responders group revealed lower E(2) and progesterone levels on the day of hCG in pregnant women compared with the non-pregnant (P = 0.01).

Conclusions: E(2) concentrations on the day of hCG administration in GnRH antagonist cycles are not associated with pregnancy rates. A potential deleterious impact of estradiol on endometrial receptivity is shown for the high responders who have high E(2) levels and improved embryo quality without a concomitant rise in pregnancy rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in