Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
- PMID: 19675206
- PMCID: PMC2768196
- DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0889
Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate factors associated with successful use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) among participants with intensively treated type 1 diabetes in the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Randomized Clinical Trial.
Research design and methods: The 232 participants randomly assigned to the CGM group (165 with baseline A1C >or=7.0% and 67 with A1C <7.0%) were asked to use CGM on a daily basis. The associations of baseline factors and early CGM use with CGM use >or=6 days/week in the 6th month and with change in A1C from baseline to 6 months were evaluated in regression models.
Results: The only baseline factors found to be associated with greater CGM use in month 6 were age >or=25 years (P < 0.001) and more frequent self-reported prestudy blood glucose meter measurements per day (P < 0.001). CGM use and the percentage of CGM glucose values between 71 and 180 mg/dl during the 1st month were predictive of CGM use in month 6 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). More frequent CGM use was associated with a greater reduction in A1C from baseline to 6 months (P < 0.001), a finding present in all age-groups.
Conclusions: After 6 months, near-daily CGM use is more frequent in intensively treated adults with type 1 diabetes than in children and adolescents, although in all age-groups near-daily CGM use is associated with a similar reduction in A1C. Frequency of blood glucose meter monitoring and initial CGM use may help predict the likelihood of long-term CGM benefit in intensively treated patients with type 1 diabetes of all ages.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00406133.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial.Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33(1):17-22. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1502. Epub 2009 Oct 16. Diabetes Care. 2010. PMID: 19837791 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2397-2406. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6928. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32543682 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The JDRF CCTN CGM TIME Trial: Timing of Initiation of continuous glucose Monitoring in Established pediatric type 1 diabetes: study protocol, recruitment and baseline characteristics.BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jul 18;14:183. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-183. BMC Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 25034216 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011 Feb;(170):76-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02582.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2011. PMID: 21323816 Review.
-
Personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management: review of the literature and implementation for practical use.Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jun;96(3):294-305. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.12.010. Epub 2011 Dec 28. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012. PMID: 22209014 Review.
Cited by
-
Youth Involvement in the Decision to Start CGM Predicts Subsequent CGM Use.Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2355-2361. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0348. Epub 2020 Jul 23. Diabetes Care. 2020. PMID: 32703764 Free PMC article.
-
Trajectories in HbA1c and other risk factors among adults with type 1 diabetes by age at onset.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 May;9(1):e002187. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002187. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021. PMID: 34059526 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of prolonged continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers with type 1 diabetes.Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Jun;13(4):301-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00837.x. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012. PMID: 22151826 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial factors and adherence to continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Jul 1;6(4):986-7. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600434. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012. PMID: 22920829 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
CGM Benefits and Burdens: Two Brief Measures of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Nov;13(6):1135-1141. doi: 10.1177/1932296819832909. Epub 2019 Mar 10. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019. PMID: 30854886 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hoerger TJ, Segel JE, Gregg EW, Saaddine JB: Is glycemic control improving in U.S. adults? Diabetes Care 2008;31:81–86 - PubMed
-
- Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, Imperatore G, Narayan KM: Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988–2002. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:465–474 - PubMed
-
- Wild D, von Maltzahn R, Brohan E, Christensen T, Clauson P, Gonder-Frederick L: A critical review of the literature on fear of hypoglycemia in diabetes: implications for diabetes management and patient education. Patient Educ Couns 2007;68:10–15 - PubMed
-
- Di Battista AM, Hart TA, Greco L, Gloizer J: Type 1 diabetes among adolescents: reduced diabetes self-care caused by social fear and fear of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:465–475 - PubMed