Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise
- PMID: 19679079
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.025
Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise
Abstract
In motor learning, our brain uses movement errors to adjust planning of future movements. This process has traditionally been studied by examining how motor planning is adjusted in response to visuomotor or dynamic perturbations. Here, I show that the learning strategy can be better identified from the statistics of movements made in the absence of perturbations. The strategy identified this way differs from the learning mechanism assumed in mainstream models for motor learning. Crucial for this strategy is that motor noise arises partly centrally, in movement planning, and partly peripherally, in movement execution. Corrections are made by modification of central planning signals from the previous movement, which include the effects of planning but not execution noise. The size of the corrections is such that the movement variability is minimized. This physiologically plausible strategy is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise, and likely underlies learning in many motor tasks.
Similar articles
-
Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task.J Physiol Paris. 2009 Sep-Dec;103(3-5):276-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Aug 7. J Physiol Paris. 2009. PMID: 19665551
-
Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):54-62. doi: 10.1152/jn.00266.2007. Epub 2007 May 16. J Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17507504
-
The role of execution noise in movement variability.J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):1050-63. doi: 10.1152/jn.00652.2003. Epub 2003 Oct 15. J Neurophysiol. 2004. PMID: 14561687
-
What is modelled during observational learning?J Sports Sci. 2007 Mar;25(5):531-45. doi: 10.1080/02640410600946860. J Sports Sci. 2007. PMID: 17365540 Review.
-
Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control.Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Dec;16(6):645-9. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Oct 30. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006. PMID: 17071073 Review.
Cited by
-
Tapping on a target: dealing with uncertainty about its position and motion.Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jan;241(1):81-104. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06503-7. Epub 2022 Nov 12. Exp Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 36371477 Free PMC article.
-
Correcting for Visuo-Haptic Biases in 3D Haptic Guidance.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0158709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158709. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27438009 Free PMC article.
-
Error Correction and the Structure of Inter-Trial Fluctuations in a Redundant Movement Task.PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Sep 19;12(9):e1005118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005118. eCollection 2016 Sep. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016. PMID: 27643895 Free PMC article.
-
Directionality in distribution and temporal structure of variability in skill acquisition.Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 6;7:225. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00225. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23761742 Free PMC article.
-
Trial-to-trial reoptimization of motor behavior due to changes in task demands is limited.PLoS One. 2013 Jun 11;8(6):e66013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066013. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23776593 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical