Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
- PMID: 1968125
- DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90218-t
Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
Abstract
The validity of twelve provocative tests for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in a random sample of 504 people from the general population was assessed. 50 woke up at night due to paraesthesiae (with or without numbness or pain) in the fingers innervated by the median nerve (CTS symptoms) in 93 hands. CTS was neurophysiologically confirmed in 28 subjects (44 hands)--a prior probability for CTS of 47%. All clinical diagnostic tests had a low validity. Posterior probability of CTS ranged from 35 to 70% for positive test results and from 41 to 62% for negative test results. A combination of three tests with relatively high validity (paresis of abductor pollicis brevis muscle, hyperpathia, and flick sign) did not significantly change the probability of CTS. Patients with CTS symptoms should be referred directly for neurophysiological examination.
Comment in
-
Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.Lancet. 1990 Mar 24;335(8691):727. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90843-t. Lancet. 1990. PMID: 1969084 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Second lumbrical-interossei nerve test predicts clinical severity and surgical outcome of carpal tunnel syndrome.J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Sep;20(9):1224-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 Jul 1. J Clin Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 23827169
-
Sensitivity and specificity of carpal tunnel syndrome signs.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Nov-Dec;76(6):451-7. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199711000-00004. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997. PMID: 9431262 Clinical Trial.
-
The diagnostic value of ultrasound compared with nerve conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome.Int J Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;17(6):612-20. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12310. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014. PMID: 24618125
-
Value of clinical provocative tests in carpal tunnel syndrome.Acta Orthop Belg. 1995;61(3):177-82. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995. PMID: 8525813 Review.
-
[Clinical and electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome].Brain Nerve. 2007 Nov;59(11):1229-38. Brain Nerve. 2007. PMID: 18044199 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
A new method to define cutoff values in nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome considering the presence of false-positive cases.Neurol Sci. 2020 Mar;41(3):669-677. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04145-2. Epub 2019 Nov 23. Neurol Sci. 2020. PMID: 31760512
-
Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies.Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1447-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.10.1447. Am J Public Health. 1998. PMID: 9772842 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic strategies using physical examination are minimally useful in defining carpal tunnel syndrome in population-based research studies.Occup Environ Med. 2010 Feb;67(2):133-5. doi: 10.1136/oem.2009.047431. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Occup Environ Med. 2010. PMID: 19854697 Free PMC article.
-
Carpal tunnel syndrome associated with chronic bursitis: A case report.J Int Med Res. 2022 May;50(5):3000605221097376. doi: 10.1177/03000605221097376. J Int Med Res. 2022. PMID: 35531908 Free PMC article.
-
Does electrodiagnostic evidence correlate with mood and function in patients with a pre-diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 May 15;63(4):335-339. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2017.453. eCollection 2017 Dec. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017. PMID: 31453476 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials