Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional bloc grafts: bone from the iliac crest vs. bovine anorganic bone. Clinical and histological results up to one year after loading from a randomized-controlled clinical trial
- PMID: 19681966
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01765.x
Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional bloc grafts: bone from the iliac crest vs. bovine anorganic bone. Clinical and histological results up to one year after loading from a randomized-controlled clinical trial
Abstract
Objectives: To compare two different techniques for vertical bone augmentation of the posterior mandible: bone blocs from the iliac crest vs. anorganic bovine bone blocs used as inlays.
Materials and methods: Ten partially edentulous patients having 5-7 mm of residual crestal height above the mandibular canal had their posterior mandibles randomly allocated to both interventions. After 4 months implants were inserted, and after 4 months, provisional prostheses were placed. Definitive prostheses were delivered after 4 months. Histomorphometry of samples trephined at implant placement, prosthesis and implant failures, any complication after loading and peri-implant marginal bone-level changes were assessed by masked assessors. All patients were followed up to 1 year after loading.
Results: Four months after bone augmentation, there was statistically significant more residual graft (between 10% and 13%) in the Bio-Oss group. There were no statistically significant differences in failures and complications. Two implants could not be placed in one patient augmented with autogenous bone because the graft failed whereas one implant and its prosthesis of the Bio-Oss group failed after loading. After implant loading only one complication (peri-implantitis) occurred at one implant of the autogenous bone group. In 16 months (from implant placement to 1 year after loading), both groups lost statistically significant amounts of peri-implant marginal bone: 0.82 mm in the autogenous bone group and 0.59 mm in the Bio-Oss group; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups.
Conclusions: Both procedures achieved good results, but the use of bovine blocs was less invasive and may be preferable than harvesting bone from the iliac crest.
Similar articles
-
Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Autumn;1(3):183-98. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008. PMID: 20467621 Clinical Trial.
-
Vertical augmentation with interpositional blocks of anorganic bovine bone vs. 7-mm-long implants in posterior mandibles: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Dec;21(12):1394-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01966.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010. PMID: 20678136 Clinical Trial.
-
Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):49-61. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018. PMID: 29557400 Clinical Trial.
-
Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented atrophic mandibles: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with a 5-year post-loading follow-up.Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(3):267-280. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019. PMID: 31535097
-
Interpositional osteotomy for posterior mandible ridge augmentation.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11 Suppl):31-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.008. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19835748 Review.
Cited by
-
Premature Bone Resorption in Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Jul;36(7):787-801. doi: 10.1111/clr.14435. Epub 2025 Mar 21. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025. PMID: 40116110 Free PMC article.
-
The sandwich osteotomy technique to treat vertical alveolar bone defects prior to implant placement: a systematic review.Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1073-1089. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03183-6. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Clin Oral Investig. 2020. PMID: 31927693
-
Custom-made 3D printed subperiosteal titanium implants for the prosthetic restoration of the atrophic posterior mandible of elderly patients: a case series.3D Print Med. 2020 Jan 8;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41205-019-0055-x. 3D Print Med. 2020. PMID: 31915946 Free PMC article.
-
BM-MSCs and Bio-Oss complexes enhanced new bone formation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation by promoting differentiation of BM-MSCs.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016 Aug;52(7):757-71. doi: 10.1007/s11626-015-9995-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2016. PMID: 27251156
-
Biomaterial selection for bone augmentation in implant dentistry: A systematic review.J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):46-50. doi: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_327_18. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2019. PMID: 31041181 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical