Are cross-regulatory interactions between homoeotic genes functionally significant?
- PMID: 1968232
- DOI: 10.1038/344078a0
Are cross-regulatory interactions between homoeotic genes functionally significant?
Abstract
The first instar larva of Drosophila consists of a chain of segments or parasegments in which the morphological pattern characteristic of each metamere is determined by the homoeotic genes, which are active in overlapping domains and are known to interact among themselves. The interactions occur at the level of transcription and allow some homoeotic genes to control the patterns and levels of expression of others. The best known among them are the down-regulation of Antennapedia (Antp) by Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and that of Ubx by abdominal-A (abd-A) and Abdominal-B (Abd-B). It has been proposed that these cross-regulatory interactions play a part in specifying cell pattern, and hence the identity of each metamere. Here we assess the functional significance of some of these interactions by expressing the Antp, Ubx or both homoeotic genes under the control of the heat-shock promoter. Predictably, we find that homoeotic gene products evade normal regulatory controls and can be maximally expressed in regions where they are normally down-regulated but, surprisingly, we find that interruption of the normal down-regulation of Antp and Ubx has no phenotypic consequences in the epidermis, where homoeotic phenotypes are normally manifest. Hence our results challenge the view that these, and possibly other cross-regulatory interactions have a role in determining segmental identity.
Similar articles
-
Homeotic gene expression in the locust Schistocerca: an antibody that detects conserved epitopes in Ultrabithorax and abdominal-A proteins.Dev Genet. 1994;15(1):19-31. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020150104. Dev Genet. 1994. PMID: 7514518
-
Expression of trunk Hox genes in the centipede Strigamia maritima: sense and anti-sense transcripts.Evol Dev. 2006 May-Jun;8(3):252-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00096.x. Evol Dev. 2006. PMID: 16686636
-
In vivo binding pattern of a trans-regulator of homoeotic genes in Drosophila melanogaster.Nature. 1989 Feb 2;337(6206):468-71. doi: 10.1038/337468a0. Nature. 1989. PMID: 2563569
-
Spatial regulation of homeo box gene expression in Drosophila.Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1987;4:116-42. Oxf Surv Eukaryot Genes. 1987. PMID: 2908022 Review.
-
Homoeotic genes.Semin Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;1(3):219-27. Semin Cell Biol. 1990. PMID: 1983316 Review.
Cited by
-
Variable motif utilization in homeotic selector (Hox)-cofactor complex formation controls specificity.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 27;108(52):21122-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114118109. Epub 2011 Dec 12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 22160705 Free PMC article.
-
Long range repression conferring boundaries of Ultrabithorax expression in the Drosophila embryo.EMBO J. 1991 Nov;10(11):3147-55. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb04876.x. EMBO J. 1991. PMID: 1680676 Free PMC article.
-
Competition for cofactor-dependent DNA binding underlies Hox phenotypic suppression.Genes Dev. 2011 Nov 15;25(22):2327-32. doi: 10.1101/gad.175539.111. Genes Dev. 2011. PMID: 22085961 Free PMC article.
-
Regulatable endogenous production of cytokinins up to 'toxic' levels in transgenic plants and plant tissues.Plant Mol Biol. 1993 Apr;22(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00038992. Plant Mol Biol. 1993. PMID: 8499612
-
Hox proteins drive cell segregation and non-autonomous apical remodelling during hindbrain segmentation.Development. 2014 Apr;141(7):1492-502. doi: 10.1242/dev.098954. Epub 2014 Feb 26. Development. 2014. PMID: 24574009 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases