Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;56(5):753-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.047. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

Prostate-specific antigen velocity for early detection of prostate cancer: result from a large, representative, population-based cohort

Affiliations

Prostate-specific antigen velocity for early detection of prostate cancer: result from a large, representative, population-based cohort

Andrew J Vickers et al. Eur Urol. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that changes in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) over time (ie, PSA velocity [PSAV]) aid prostate cancer detection. Some guidelines do incorporate PSAV cut points as an indication for biopsy.

Objective: To evaluate whether PSAV enhances prediction of biopsy outcome in a large, representative, population-based cohort.

Design, setting, and participants: There were 2742 screening-arm participants with PSA <3 ng/ml at initial screening in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer in Rotterdam, Netherlands, or Göteborg, Sweden, and who were subsequently biopsied during rounds 2-6 due to elevated PSA.

Measurements: Total, free, and intact PSA and human kallikrein 2 were measured for 1-6 screening rounds at intervals of 2 or 4 yr. We created logistic regression models to predict prostate cancer based on age and PSA, with or without free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA). PSAV was added to each model and any enhancement in predictive accuracy assessed by area under the curve (AUC).

Results and limitations: PSAV led to small enhancements in predictive accuracy (AUC of 0.569 vs 0.531; 0.626 vs 0.609 if %fPSA was included), although not for high-grade disease. The enhancement depended on modeling a nonlinear relationship between PSAV and cancer. There was no benefit if we excluded men with higher velocities, which were associated with lower risk. These results apply to men in a screening program with elevated PSA; men with prior negative biopsy were not evaluated in this study.

Conclusions: In men with PSA of about ≥3 ng/ml, we found little justification for formal calculation of PSAV or for use of PSAV cut points to determine biopsy. Informal assessment of PSAV will likely aid clinical judgment, such as a sudden rise in PSA suggesting prostatitis, which could be further evaluated before biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
[en] Flow of participants through the study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
[en] Predicted probability of a positive biopsy with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, controlling for PSA. Probabilities are for a subject with a PSA level of 4.3 ng/ml, which was the mean PSA for the cohort. Black line: modeled with nonlinear terms; gray line: modeled with only a linear term; dashed lines: 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
[en] Decision curve analysis. The curves show the clinical benefit for basing biopsy decisions on the models with total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) plus age (dotted line), total PSA plus age plus free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA; dashed line), and total PSA plus age plus %fPSA plus PSA velocity (thin solid line); biopsy all men (thick grey line); and biopsy no man (thick black line).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
[en] Decision curve analysis for men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity <0.75 ng/ml per year. Total PSA plus age (dotted line), total PSA plus age plus free-to-total PSA ratio (%fPSA; dashed line), total PSA plus age plus %fPSA plus PSA velocity (thin solid line), biopsy all men (thick grey line), biopsy no man (thick black line).

Comment in

References

    1. Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–8. - PubMed
    1. Thompson IM, Chi C, Ankerst DP, et al. Effect of finasteride on the sensitivity of PSA for detecting prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98:1128–33. - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2008;53:68–80. - PubMed
    1. Vickers AJ, Lilja H. Prostate cancer: estimating the benefits of PSA screening. Nat Rev Urol. 2009;6:301–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Begg CB, Greenes RA. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias. Biometrics. 1983;39:207–15. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances