Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy
- PMID: 19683685
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy
Abstract
Objective: To compare surgical outcomes of patients with symptomatic leiomyomas after robot-assisted ("robotic") or laparoscopic myomectomy.
Study design: Retrospective chart review of 81 patients undergoing robotic (n=40) or laparoscopic (n=41) myomectomy. Data included fibroid characteristics (number, weight, location, and pathologic findings), operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospitalization length.
Results: Patients undergoing laparoscopy had a significantly larger mean uterine size, larger mean size of the largest fibroid, and greater number of fibroids. When adjusted for uterine size and fibroid size and number, no significant differences were noted between robotic vs laparoscopic groups for mean operating time (141 vs 166 minutes), mean blood loss (100 vs 250 mL), intraoperative or postoperative complications (2% vs 20% and 11% vs 17%, respectively), hospital stay more than 2 days (12% vs 23%), readmissions, or symptom resolution.
Conclusion: Short-term surgical outcomes were similar after robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy; long-term outcomes were not assessed.
Comment in
-
Discussion: 'Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy' by Bedient et al.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.09.017. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19961983 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.06.008. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17980329
-
Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Nov-Dec;16(6):730-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.07.014. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19896599
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):306-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.01.011. Epub 2010 Mar 19. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20303834
-
Endoscopic management of uterine fibroids.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Aug;22(4):707-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 6. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008. PMID: 18325839 Review.
-
Feasibility and safety of vaginal myomectomy: a prospective pilot study.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.09.010. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18312985 Review.
Cited by
-
Symptoms and Health Quality After Laparoscopic and Robotic Myomectomy.JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4):e2018.00030. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00030. JSLS. 2018. PMID: 30524183 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Open, laparoscopic and robotic myomectomies - comparison of outcomes.J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022 Sep 5;23(3):211-212. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2022.2022-1-7. Epub 2022 Jul 5. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35781517 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Is robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy limited in multiple myomas?: a feasibility for ten or more myomas.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jan;61(1):135-141. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.1.135. Epub 2017 Dec 22. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018. PMID: 29372160 Free PMC article.
-
Asian society of gynecologic oncology workshop 2010.J Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Sep;21(3):137-50. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.3.137. Epub 2010 Sep 28. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20922136 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 28;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03104-8. World J Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37507735 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical