Attitudes toward the vaginal ring and transdermal patch among adolescents and young women
- PMID: 19699422
- PMCID: PMC2749568
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.02.007
Attitudes toward the vaginal ring and transdermal patch among adolescents and young women
Abstract
Purpose: The vaginal ring and the transdermal patch offer important contraceptive options for women at high risk for unintended pregnancy. Little is known about what adolescents and young women think about these methods and why use of the ring has been relatively low compared with the patch. We sought to examine young women's attitudes and perceptions about the ring and the patch to better understand the relationship between perceptions of these methods and decisions to use them.
Methods: Sixteen focus groups of young women aged 15-26 years (n=113) from family planning clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area were convened. Data from the focus groups were analyzed using standard content analysis.
Results: Although young women expressed apprehension and doubt about both methods, for the most part women expressed more positive attitudes about the patch. Two related themes for the ring and the patch were identified: "lack of trust in effectiveness," and "method use concerns". Two themes unique to the ring ("concerns regarding vaginal insertion" and "sexual partner perceptions") and three themes unique to the patch ("ease of remembering," "visibility issues," and "perceived health risk") were identified.
Conclusions: Increased provider education about apprehensions related to the ring and the patch may lead to increased use of the ring and may counter recent declines in use of the patch. It would be unfortunate if these safe and effective options for young women were to be underused because negative attitudes and perceptions about these methods acted as barriers to adoption.
Similar articles
-
A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Jun;51(2):71-80. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12103. Epub 2019 May 20. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 31108027 Free PMC article.
-
Pill, patch or ring? A mixed methods analysis of provider counseling about combined hormonal contraception.Contraception. 2019 Feb;99(2):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 15. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 30227121 Free PMC article.
-
Women's perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling.BMC Womens Health. 2013 Feb 28;13:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9. BMC Womens Health. 2013. PMID: 23448283 Free PMC article.
-
Hormonal contraceptive method choice among young, low-income women: how important is the provider?Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec;81(3):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.010. Epub 2010 Sep 15. Patient Educ Couns. 2010. PMID: 20837389 Free PMC article.
-
The vaginal ring and transdermal patch: new methods of contraception.Sex Health. 2006 Sep;3(3):135-42. doi: 10.1071/sh05060. Sex Health. 2006. PMID: 17044218 Review.
Cited by
-
End-user preference for and choice of four vaginally delivered HIV prevention methods among young women in South Africa and Zimbabwe: the Quatro Clinical Crossover Study.J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 May;22(5):e25283. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25283. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019. PMID: 31069957 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Oct 4;45:25-34. doi: 10.1363/45e7619. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 31592770 Free PMC article.
-
Two Birds with One Stone: Health Care Providers' Perspectives about Prevention Technologies in Kenya and South Africa.J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:2325958219841366. doi: 10.1177/2325958219841366. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2019. PMID: 31018754 Free PMC article.
-
A Qualitative Systematic Review of Women's Experiences Using Contraceptive Vaginal Rings: Implications for New Technologies.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019 Jun;51(2):71-80. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12103. Epub 2019 May 20. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 31108027 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.PLoS One. 2019 Nov 8;14(11):e0224898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224898. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31703094 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Henshaw S. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:24–29. - PubMed
-
- Finer LB, Henshaw S. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2006;38:90–96. - PubMed
-
- Dieben TOM, Roumen FJME, Apter D. Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:585–93. - PubMed
-
- Weisberg E, Fraser IS, Misell DR, Lacarra M, Bardin CW. The acceptability of a combined oestrogen/progestogen contraceptive vaginal ring. Contraception. 1995;51:39–44. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical