A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
- PMID: 19700296
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005
A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
Abstract
Study objective: To compare anesthetic management and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with general anesthesia.
Design: Retrospective database study of RALP and RRP patients at Duke University Medical Center from 6/2003 to 6/2006.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Patients: 541 ASA physical status I, II, and III men, 280 of whom were RRP patients and 256 RALP patients.
Measurements: Patient demographics, intraoperative fluids and blood products, hemodynamic parameters, pain scores in the Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU), intraoperative and postoperative analgesic consumption, need for rescue antiemetics in the PACU, and intraoperative use of vasopressors and antihypertensives, were all recorded. Additional data included postoperative transfusion data; clinical status of the patient's cancer preoperatively and postoperatively; hematocrit, platelet count, and creatinine levels; and length of hospital stay.
Main results: Estimated blood loss (EBL) was higher for RRP than RALP patients (mean +/- SD; 1,087 +/- 853 mL vs. 287 +/- 317 mL; P < 0.0001). Likewise, 24% of RRP patients received red blood cell (RBC) transfusions intraoperatively, compared with 0.4% RALP patients (P < 0.0001). Intraoperatively, RALP patients received more antihypertensive agents (37% vs. 21%; P < 0.0001), and fewer vasopressors (63% vs. 78%; P < 0.0001) than did RRP patients. The two groups had similar morphine-equivalent opioid use intraoperatively, but in the PACU, RALP patients required fewer morphine equivalents (mean +/- SD; 11.4 +/- 7.7 mg vs. 14.9 +/- 9.8 mg; P < 0.0001). The RALP patients had longer surgical times (mean +/- SD; 296 +/- 76 vs.193 +/- 69 min; P < 0.0001) but shorter PACU stays (mean +/- SD; 113 +/- 55 min vs. 143 +/- 58 min; P < 0.0001) and shorter hospital stays (mean +/- SD; 44 +/- 77 hrs vs. 56 +/- 26 hrs; P = 0.009).
Conclusions: Duration of surgery was greater with RALP, but it was associated with less EBL, fewer transfusions of blood products, and shorter PACU and hospital stays.
Similar articles
-
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):912-4; discussion 914. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169455.25510.ff. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 16093986 Clinical Trial.
-
Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.Urology. 2006 Feb;67(2):360-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.029. Urology. 2006. PMID: 16461085
-
Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.BJU Int. 2008 Jul;102(1):28-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07607.x. Epub 2008 Apr 2. BJU Int. 2008. PMID: 18384634
-
Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques.Can J Urol. 2006 Feb;13 Suppl 1:56-61. Can J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16526984 Review.
-
Counterpoint: robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: perhaps the surgical gold standard for prostate cancer care.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007 Aug;5(7):689-92. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2007. PMID: 17692172 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels after robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy: an observational study.Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Jan-Feb;72(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 33819496 Free PMC article.
-
Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):54-60. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0184. Int Braz J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30521164 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update.Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):32237-32257. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13332. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 27852051 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23. World J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29362896 Review.
-
Laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review of pharmacotherapy in pain management.Drugs. 2015 Nov;75(16):1867-89. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0482-y. Drugs. 2015. PMID: 26493289 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical