Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep;29(6):626-8.
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2ba1b.

Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children

Gleeson Rebello et al. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Background: This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing skin closure time between coaptive film and subcuticular monocryl sutures in children undergoing identical single session, bilateral limb multiple soft tissue releases.

Methods: Eight children less than 18 years of age (mean 14.5) with cerebral palsy underwent identical, single session bilateral multiple soft tissue releases in the lower limb from August 2005 to March 2007. There were 50 incisions in all in which 25 incisions were closed with 4-0 intracuticular monocryl sutures and 25 were closed with coaptive film (Steri Strip S; 3M company). Time taken for closure using either technique was recorded. A blinded plastic surgeon used a visual analog scale to assess the cosmetic results at the end of a 3 month follow-up.

Results: The average length of incisions closed with coaptive film was almost identical to the corresponding incision on the contralateral limb that was closed with subcuticular monocryl suture (4.45 and 4.81 cm, P=0.66). The average time for skin closure using monocryl sutures was 167.04 seconds compared with the average time of 79.36 seconds when using coaptive film (P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic results or the number of wound complications using either technique.

Conclusion: Coaptive film is an attractive and cost-effective option for skin closure after pediatric surgery.

Clinical relevance: The time saved, comparable cosmetic results and lack of complications makes coaptive film an attractive option for skin closure in the pediatric age group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances