Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children
- PMID: 19700995
- DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2ba1b
Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time following identical, single-session, bilateral limb surgery in children
Abstract
Background: This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing skin closure time between coaptive film and subcuticular monocryl sutures in children undergoing identical single session, bilateral limb multiple soft tissue releases.
Methods: Eight children less than 18 years of age (mean 14.5) with cerebral palsy underwent identical, single session bilateral multiple soft tissue releases in the lower limb from August 2005 to March 2007. There were 50 incisions in all in which 25 incisions were closed with 4-0 intracuticular monocryl sutures and 25 were closed with coaptive film (Steri Strip S; 3M company). Time taken for closure using either technique was recorded. A blinded plastic surgeon used a visual analog scale to assess the cosmetic results at the end of a 3 month follow-up.
Results: The average length of incisions closed with coaptive film was almost identical to the corresponding incision on the contralateral limb that was closed with subcuticular monocryl suture (4.45 and 4.81 cm, P=0.66). The average time for skin closure using monocryl sutures was 167.04 seconds compared with the average time of 79.36 seconds when using coaptive film (P <0.0001). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic results or the number of wound complications using either technique.
Conclusion: Coaptive film is an attractive and cost-effective option for skin closure after pediatric surgery.
Clinical relevance: The time saved, comparable cosmetic results and lack of complications makes coaptive film an attractive option for skin closure in the pediatric age group.
Similar articles
-
A prospective, randomized comparison of skin adhesive and subcuticular suture for closure of pediatric hernia incisions: cost and cosmetic considerations.J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jul;44(7):1418-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.051. J Pediatr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19573672 Clinical Trial.
-
Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time after posterior spinal instrumented fusion in pediatric patients with spinal deformity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2027-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c8ad82. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20531072 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2152.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.029. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013. PMID: 24237777 Clinical Trial.
-
Five year experience with tape closure of abdominal wounds.Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989 Oct;169(4):310-4. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989. PMID: 2528832 Review.
-
Plastic surgery made easy - simple techniques for closing skin defects and improving cosmetic results.Aust Fam Physician. 2006 Jul;35(7):492-6. Aust Fam Physician. 2006. PMID: 16820819 Review.
Cited by
-
Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 9;4(4):CD012124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012124.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32271475 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study between coaptive film versus suture for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation.Malays Orthop J. 2013 Mar;7(1):52-5. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1303.017. Malays Orthop J. 2013. PMID: 25722808 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Dec 27;6(12):241-7. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 25548609 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical