Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;3(6):427-30.
doi: 10.4161/psb.3.6.5473.

Induction as well as suppression: How aphid saliva may exert opposite effects on plant defense

Affiliations

Induction as well as suppression: How aphid saliva may exert opposite effects on plant defense

Torsten Will et al. Plant Signal Behav. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Aphids ingest from the sieve tubes and by doing so they are confronted with sieve-tube occlusion mechanisms, which are part of the plant defense system. Because aphids are able to feed over longer periods, they must be able to prevent occlusion of the sieve plates induced by stylet penetration. Occlusion probably depends upon Ca(2+)-influx into the sieve element (SE) lumen. Aphid behavior, biochemical tests and in vitro experiments demonstrated that aphid's watery saliva, injected during initial phase of a stylet penetration into the SE lumen, contains proteins that are able to bind calcium and prevent calcium-induced SE occlusion. In this addendum, we speculate on the consequences of saliva secretion for plant resistance. (a) The release of elicitors (e.g., oligogalacturonides) due to cell wall digestion by gel saliva enzymes may increase the resistance of cortex, phloem parenchyma cells and companion cells (CC) around the puncture site. (b) Ca(2+)-binding by aphid watery saliva may suppress the local defense responses in the SEs. (c) Signaling cascades triggered in CCs may lead to systemic resistance.

Keywords: aphid saliva; aphid/plant-interaction; calcium binding; elicitor; local plant defense; oligogalacturonides; phloem translocation; systemic plant defense.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothetical model on how stylet penetration induces and suppresses plant defense. Sheath saliva (light blue) that envelopes the stylet during propagation through the apoplast contains cellulase and pectinase,, enzymes producing elicitors (e.g., oligogalacturonides (oGs)) by local cell wall digestion. Parenchyma cells adjacent to the sheath may develop a defense response owing to signaling cascades triggered by oG-mediated Ca2+-influx. Together with a Ca2+-dependent transient closure of plasmodesmata by callose (black crosses),, the focused production of oGs may cause a defense response with a limited sphere of action (red—strong, brown—light, green—none). This restricted domain of defense may not be perceived by other aphids, since the settling distance is limited by the aphid body size. Nearby aphids do not show any sign of defense perception in their probing and feeding behavior. Signaling cascade compounds may be channeled from parenchyma cells to CCs (dashed yellow arrows), where they are subsequently released into the SEs. There they may act as long-distance systemic defense components (grey arrows). In contrast to the parenchyma domain (where only minor amounts of watery saliva are secreted), Ca2+-mediated reactions such as defense cascades and sieve-plate (SP) occlusion are suppressed in SEs by large amounts of watery saliva. The left aphid penetrates an SE and injects watery saliva (red cloud; ws) that inhibits local sieve-plate occlusion and, most likely, is transported by mass flow (black arrow) to adjacent SEs, where occlusion is impeded as well. A short-distance systemic spread over a few centimeters may explain local suppression of plant defense resulting in a higher rate of colonization. Salivary proteins or their degradation products may serve as systemic defense signals as well (grey arrows), but may also diffuse via the PPUs into CCs where additional systemic signals are induced (yellow arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypothetical involvement of Ca2+-channels in aphid-induced cell defense (detail). During probing with its stylet the aphid secretes gel saliva as a lubrication substance (light blue) into the apoplast. on the way to the sieve tubes, aphids briefly puncture most non-phloem cells (red) after which the puncturing sites are sealed with gel saliva., Gel saliva also most likely prevents the influx of apoplastic calcium into pierced sieve elements (green) by sealing the penetration site. Watery saliva (red cloud), injected into the SE lumen, contains proteins which bind calcium ions (marked by X) that enter the SE via e.g., mechano sensitive Ca2+-channels activated by stylet penetration (blue tons). In this way, aphids suppress SE occlusion and activation of local defense cascades. In the parenchyma cells around the gel saliva sheath, a small cylindrical zone of defense may be induced by oligogalacturonides (oGs; brown triangles) produced by cell wall (grey) digestion.– Perceived by unknown receptor proteins (R; e.g., a receptor like protein kinase) and kinase mediation (black dotted and dashed arrows), oGs lead to a Ca2+-influx through kinase activated calcium channels (orange tons). Around the probing site, aphids apparently induce the production of superoxide by Ca2+-induced activation of the NADPH oxidase (violet box) and its following conversion to hydrogen peroxide (red spots) is mediated by superoxide dismutase (SoD). Hydrogen peroxide activates Ca2+-channels (violet tons) and diffuses through plasma membrane (curled arrows) therefore potentially acting as a intracellular signal.

Comment on

  • Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva.
    Will T, Tjallingii WF, Thönnessen A, van Bel AJ. Will T, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 19;104(25):10536-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703535104. Epub 2007 Jun 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007. PMID: 17553961 Free PMC article.

References

    1. van Bel AJE. The phloem: a miracle of ingenuity. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:125–149.
    1. van Bel AJE. In: Cell-Cell Channels. Baluska F, Volkmann D, Barlow PW, editors. 2006. pp. 113–118. ( www.Eurekah.com)
    1. Goggin F. Plant-aphid interactions: molecular and ecological perspectives. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10:399–408. - PubMed
    1. Martinez de Ilarduya OM, Xie QG, Kaloshian I. Aphid-induced defense responses in Mi-1-mediated compatible and incompatible tomato interactions. Mol Plant Microb Interact. 2003;16:699–708. - PubMed
    1. Knoblauch M, van Bel AJE. Sieve tubes in action. Plant Cell. 1998;10:35–50.

LinkOut - more resources